Demographics details for Surprise, AZ vs Tehachapi, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Surprise, AZ vs Tehachapi, CA.
| Data | Surprise | Tehachapi |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 154,198 | 12,389 |
| Median Age | 41.5 years | 38.3 years |
| Median Income | $87,756 | $62,788 |
| Married Families | 44.0% | 32.0% |
| Poverty Level | 13% | 11% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.9 | 6.5 |
Population Comparison: Surprise vs Tehachapi
- In Surprise, the population is higher at 154,198, compared to 12,389 in Tehachapi.
- Residents in Surprise have a higher median age of 41.5 years compared to 38.3 years in Tehachapi.
- Surprise has a higher median income of $87,756 compared to $62,788 in Tehachapi.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Surprise at 44.0% compared to 32.0% in Tehachapi.
- Surprise has a higher poverty level at 13% compared to 11% in Tehachapi.
- Tehachapi has a higher unemployment rate at 6.5% compared to 3.9% in Surprise.
Demographics
Demographics Surprise vs Tehachapi provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Surprise | Tehachapi |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 5 | 7 |
| White | 63 | 37 |
| Asian | 2 | 3 |
| Hispanic | 20 | 37 |
| Two or More Races | 9 | 12 |
| American Indian | 1 | 4 |
Demographics Comparison: Surprise vs Tehachapi
- In Tehachapi, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 7% compared to 5% in Surprise.
- Surprise has a higher percentage of White residents at 63% compared to 37% in Tehachapi.
- In Tehachapi, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 2% in Surprise.
- Tehachapi has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 37%, compared to 20% in Surprise.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Tehachapi at 12%, compared to 9% in Surprise.
- In Tehachapi, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 4%, compared to 1% in Surprise.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Surprise | Tehachapi |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.0% | 16.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.1% | 12.6% |
| Depression | 20.1% | 17.6% |
| Smoking | 14.4% | 16.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.5% | 18.7% |
| Obesity | 30.1% | 35.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Surprise vs Tehachapi
- More residents in Surprise report poor mental health at 17.0% compared to 16.0% in Tehachapi.
- Depression is more prevalent in Surprise at 20.1% compared to 17.6% in Tehachapi.
- Tehachapi has a higher smoking rate at 16.4% compared to 14.4% in Surprise.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Tehachapi at 18.7% compared to 18.5% in Surprise.
- Tehachapi has higher obesity rates at 35.2% compared to 30.1% in Surprise.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Tehachapi at 12.0% compared to 11.0% in Surprise.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Surprise | Tehachapi |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.5% (754) | 1.4% (172) |
| High School Diploma | 13.7% (21,050) | 13.3% (1,649) |
| Less than High School | 7.6% (11,792) | 27.7% (3,437) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 19.9% (30,735) | 10.9% (1,354) |
Education Levels Comparison: Surprise vs Tehachapi
- In Tehachapi, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.4% compared to 0.5% in Surprise.
- A higher percentage of residents in Surprise hold a high school diploma at 13.7% compared to 13.3% in Tehachapi.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Tehachapi at 27.7%, compared to 7.6% in Surprise.
- A higher percentage of residents in Surprise hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.9% compared to 10.9% in Tehachapi.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.