Demographics details for Surprise, AZ vs Gresham, OR
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Surprise, AZ vs Gresham, OR.
| Data | Surprise | Gresham |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 154,198 | 111,621 |
| Median Age | 41.5 years | 37.3 years |
| Median Income | $87,756 | $69,437 |
| Married Families | 44.0% | 38.0% |
| Poverty Level | 13% | 13% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.9 | 3.9 |
Population Comparison: Surprise vs Gresham
- In Surprise, the population is higher at 154,198, compared to 111,621 in Gresham.
- Residents in Surprise have a higher median age of 41.5 years compared to 37.3 years in Gresham.
- Surprise has a higher median income of $87,756 compared to $69,437 in Gresham.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Surprise at 44.0% compared to 38.0% in Gresham.
- The poverty level is identical in both Surprise and Gresham at 13%.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Surprise and Gresham at 3.9%.
Demographics
Demographics Surprise vs Gresham provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Surprise | Gresham |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 5 | 4 |
| White | 63 | 55 |
| Asian | 2 | 5 |
| Hispanic | 20 | 22 |
| Two or More Races | 9 | 13 |
| American Indian | 1 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Surprise vs Gresham
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Surprise at 5% compared to 4% in Gresham.
- Surprise has a higher percentage of White residents at 63% compared to 55% in Gresham.
- In Gresham, the Asian population stands at 5%, greater than 2% in Surprise.
- Gresham has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 22%, compared to 20% in Surprise.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Gresham at 13%, compared to 9% in Surprise.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Surprise and Gresham at 1%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Surprise | Gresham |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.0% | 20.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.1% | 12.3% |
| Depression | 20.1% | 28.4% |
| Smoking | 14.4% | 17.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.5% | 20.2% |
| Obesity | 30.1% | 28.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 15.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Surprise vs Gresham
- In Gresham, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.0% compared to 17.0% in Surprise.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Gresham at 28.4% versus 20.1% in Surprise.
- Gresham has a higher smoking rate at 17.6% compared to 14.4% in Surprise.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Gresham at 20.2% compared to 18.5% in Surprise.
- Obesity rates are higher in Surprise at 30.1% compared to 28.6% in Gresham.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Gresham at 15.0% compared to 11.0% in Surprise.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Surprise | Gresham |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.5% (754) | 1.6% (1,757) |
| High School Diploma | 13.7% (21,050) | 15.0% (16,776) |
| Less than High School | 7.6% (11,792) | 16.5% (18,399) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 19.9% (30,735) | 16.2% (18,082) |
Education Levels Comparison: Surprise vs Gresham
- In Gresham, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.6% compared to 0.5% in Surprise.
- In Gresham, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 15.0% compared to 13.7% in Surprise.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Gresham at 16.5%, compared to 7.6% in Surprise.
- A higher percentage of residents in Surprise hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.9% compared to 16.2% in Gresham.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.