Demographics details for Surprise, AZ vs Greenup, IL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Surprise, AZ vs Greenup, IL.
| Data | Surprise | Greenup |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 154,198 | 1,352 |
| Median Age | 41.5 years | 35.7 years |
| Median Income | $87,756 | $53,583 |
| Married Families | 44.0% | 47.0% |
| Poverty Level | 13% | 9% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.9 | 3.9 |
Population Comparison: Surprise vs Greenup
- In Surprise, the population is higher at 154,198, compared to 1,352 in Greenup.
- Residents in Surprise have a higher median age of 41.5 years compared to 35.7 years in Greenup.
- Surprise has a higher median income of $87,756 compared to $53,583 in Greenup.
- In Greenup, the percentage of married families is higher at 47.0%, compared to 44.0% in Surprise.
- Surprise has a higher poverty level at 13% compared to 9% in Greenup.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Surprise and Greenup at 3.9%.
Demographics
Demographics Surprise vs Greenup provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Surprise | Greenup |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 5 | Data is updating |
| White | 63 | 99 |
| Asian | 2 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 20 | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 9 | 1 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Surprise vs Greenup
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Surprise at 5% compared to 0% in Greenup.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Greenup at 99% compared to 63% in Surprise.
- The Asian population is larger in Surprise at 2% compared to 0% in Greenup.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Surprise at 20% compared to 0% in Greenup.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Surprise at 9% compared to 1% in Greenup.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Surprise at 1% compared to 0% in Greenup.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Surprise | Greenup |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.0% | 17.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.1% | 11.9% |
| Depression | 20.1% | 23.5% |
| Smoking | 14.4% | 19.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.5% | 17.7% |
| Obesity | 30.1% | 37.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 21.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Surprise vs Greenup
- In Greenup, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.4% compared to 17.0% in Surprise.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Greenup at 23.5% versus 20.1% in Surprise.
- Greenup has a higher smoking rate at 19.2% compared to 14.4% in Surprise.
- Binge drinking is more common in Surprise at 18.5% compared to 17.7% in Greenup.
- Greenup has higher obesity rates at 37.1% compared to 30.1% in Surprise.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Greenup at 21.0% compared to 11.0% in Surprise.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Surprise | Greenup |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.5% (754) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 13.7% (21,050) | 29.0% (392) |
| Less than High School | 7.6% (11,792) | 18.3% (248) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 19.9% (30,735) | 11.0% (149) |
Education Levels Comparison: Surprise vs Greenup
- A higher percentage of residents in Surprise have no formal schooling at 0.5% compared to 0.0% in Greenup.
- In Greenup, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 29.0% compared to 13.7% in Surprise.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Greenup at 18.3%, compared to 7.6% in Surprise.
- A higher percentage of residents in Surprise hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.9% compared to 11.0% in Greenup.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.