Demographics details for Surprise, AZ vs Cole camp, MO
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Surprise, AZ vs Cole camp, MO.
Data | Surprise | Cole camp |
---|---|---|
Population | 154,198 | 1,149 |
Median Age | 41.5 years | 47.2 years |
Median Income | $87,756 | $40,192 |
Married Families | 44.0% | 48.0% |
Poverty Level | 13% | 12% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.9 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Surprise vs Cole camp
- In Surprise, the population is higher at 154,198, compared to 1,149 in Cole camp.
- The median age in Cole camp is higher at 47.2 years, compared to 41.5 years in Surprise.
- Surprise has a higher median income of $87,756 compared to $40,192 in Cole camp.
- In Cole camp, the percentage of married families is higher at 48.0%, compared to 44.0% in Surprise.
- Surprise has a higher poverty level at 13% compared to 12% in Cole camp.
- The unemployment rate in Surprise is higher at 3.9%, compared to 3.5% in Cole camp.
Demographics
Demographics Surprise vs Cole camp provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Surprise | Cole camp |
---|---|---|
Black | 5 | Data is updating |
White | 63 | 100 |
Asian | 2 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 20 | Data is updating |
Two or More Races | 9 | Data is updating |
American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Surprise vs Cole camp
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Surprise at 5% compared to 0% in Cole camp.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Cole camp at 100% compared to 63% in Surprise.
- The Asian population is larger in Surprise at 2% compared to 0% in Cole camp.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Surprise at 20% compared to 0% in Cole camp.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Surprise at 9% compared to 0% in Cole camp.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Surprise at 1% compared to 0% in Cole camp.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Surprise | Cole camp |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 17.0% | 19.0% |
Physical Health Not Good | 10.1% | 13.7% |
Depression | 20.1% | 24.7% |
Smoking | 14.4% | 22.4% |
Binge Drinking | 18.5% | 16.6% |
Obesity | 30.1% | 42.4% |
Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 19.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Surprise vs Cole camp
- In Cole camp, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.0% compared to 17.0% in Surprise.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Cole camp at 24.7% versus 20.1% in Surprise.
- Cole camp has a higher smoking rate at 22.4% compared to 14.4% in Surprise.
- Binge drinking is more common in Surprise at 18.5% compared to 16.6% in Cole camp.
- Cole camp has higher obesity rates at 42.4% compared to 30.1% in Surprise.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Cole camp at 19.0% compared to 11.0% in Surprise.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Surprise | Cole camp |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.5% (754) | 0.4% (5) |
High School Diploma | 13.7% (21,050) | 31.4% (361) |
Less than High School | 7.6% (11,792) | 10.6% (122) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 19.9% (30,735) | 14.4% (166) |
Education Levels Comparison: Surprise vs Cole camp
- A higher percentage of residents in Surprise have no formal schooling at 0.5% compared to 0.4% in Cole camp.
- In Cole camp, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 31.4% compared to 13.7% in Surprise.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Cole camp at 10.6%, compared to 7.6% in Surprise.
- A higher percentage of residents in Surprise hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.9% compared to 14.4% in Cole camp.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.