Demographics details for Surprise, AZ vs Clayton, NC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Surprise, AZ vs Clayton, NC.
| Data | Surprise | Clayton |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 154,198 | 29,445 |
| Median Age | 41.5 years | 32.6 years |
| Median Income | $87,756 | $71,698 |
| Married Families | 44.0% | 35.0% |
| Poverty Level | 13% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.9 | 3.7 |
Population Comparison: Surprise vs Clayton
- In Surprise, the population is higher at 154,198, compared to 29,445 in Clayton.
- Residents in Surprise have a higher median age of 41.5 years compared to 32.6 years in Clayton.
- Surprise has a higher median income of $87,756 compared to $71,698 in Clayton.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Surprise at 44.0% compared to 35.0% in Clayton.
- Surprise has a higher poverty level at 13% compared to 5% in Clayton.
- The unemployment rate in Surprise is higher at 3.9%, compared to 3.7% in Clayton.
Demographics
Demographics Surprise vs Clayton provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Surprise | Clayton |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 5 | 22 |
| White | 63 | 59 |
| Asian | 2 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 20 | 13 |
| Two or More Races | 9 | 5 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Surprise vs Clayton
- In Clayton, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 22% compared to 5% in Surprise.
- Surprise has a higher percentage of White residents at 63% compared to 59% in Clayton.
- The Asian population is larger in Surprise at 2% compared to 1% in Clayton.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Surprise at 20% compared to 13% in Clayton.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Surprise at 9% compared to 5% in Clayton.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Surprise at 1% compared to 0% in Clayton.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Surprise | Clayton |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.0% | 15.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.1% | 10.4% |
| Depression | 20.1% | 23.1% |
| Smoking | 14.4% | 15.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.5% | 17.6% |
| Obesity | 30.1% | 39.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Surprise vs Clayton
- More residents in Surprise report poor mental health at 17.0% compared to 15.6% in Clayton.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Clayton at 23.1% versus 20.1% in Surprise.
- Clayton has a higher smoking rate at 15.2% compared to 14.4% in Surprise.
- Binge drinking is more common in Surprise at 18.5% compared to 17.6% in Clayton.
- Clayton has higher obesity rates at 39.9% compared to 30.1% in Surprise.
- Disability percentages are higher in Surprise at 11.0% compared to 10.0% in Clayton.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Surprise | Clayton |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.5% (754) | 0.7% (210) |
| High School Diploma | 13.7% (21,050) | 12.6% (3,700) |
| Less than High School | 7.6% (11,792) | 5.4% (1,598) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 19.9% (30,735) | 18.6% (5,471) |
Education Levels Comparison: Surprise vs Clayton
- In Clayton, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.5% in Surprise.
- A higher percentage of residents in Surprise hold a high school diploma at 13.7% compared to 12.6% in Clayton.
- More residents in Surprise have less than a high school education at 7.6% compared to 5.4% in Clayton.
- A higher percentage of residents in Surprise hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.9% compared to 18.6% in Clayton.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.