Demographics details for Superior, WI vs Lansing, MI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Superior, WI vs Lansing, MI.
Data | Superior | Lansing |
---|---|---|
Population | 26,459 | 112,537 |
Median Age | 38.7 years | 32.9 years |
Median Income | $54,935 | $50,747 |
Married Families | 33.0% | 28.0% |
Poverty Level | 11% | 19% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.8 | 7.4 |
Population Comparison: Superior vs Lansing
- The population in Lansing is higher at 112,537, compared to 26,459 in Superior.
- Residents in Superior have a higher median age of 38.7 years compared to 32.9 years in Lansing.
- Superior has a higher median income of $54,935 compared to $50,747 in Lansing.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Superior at 33.0% compared to 28.0% in Lansing.
- The poverty level is higher in Lansing at 19%, compared to 11% in Superior.
- Lansing has a higher unemployment rate at 7.4% compared to 3.8% in Superior.
Demographics
Demographics Superior vs Lansing provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Superior | Lansing |
---|---|---|
Black | 2 | 24 |
White | 87 | 48 |
Asian | 2 | 5 |
Hispanic | 2 | 13 |
Two or More Races | 5 | 10 |
American Indian | 2 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Superior vs Lansing
- In Lansing, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 24% compared to 2% in Superior.
- Superior has a higher percentage of White residents at 87% compared to 48% in Lansing.
- In Lansing, the Asian population stands at 5%, greater than 2% in Superior.
- Lansing has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 13%, compared to 2% in Superior.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Lansing at 10%, compared to 5% in Superior.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Superior at 2% compared to 0% in Lansing.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Superior | Lansing |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 15.7% | 19.3% |
Physical Health Not Good | 10.8% | 12.9% |
Depression | 24.0% | 26.3% |
Smoking | 17.3% | 19.6% |
Binge Drinking | 25.5% | 16.0% |
Obesity | 36.9% | 40.7% |
Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 17.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Superior vs Lansing
- In Lansing, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.3% compared to 15.7% in Superior.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Lansing at 26.3% versus 24.0% in Superior.
- Lansing has a higher smoking rate at 19.6% compared to 17.3% in Superior.
- Binge drinking is more common in Superior at 25.5% compared to 16.0% in Lansing.
- Lansing has higher obesity rates at 40.7% compared to 36.9% in Superior.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Lansing at 17.0% compared to 16.0% in Superior.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Superior | Lansing |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.6% (149) | 1.3% (1,419) |
High School Diploma | 17.4% (4,616) | 13.5% (15,216) |
Less than High School | 7.6% (2,003) | 10.0% (11,269) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 19.8% (5,251) | 19.3% (21,667) |
Education Levels Comparison: Superior vs Lansing
- In Lansing, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.3% compared to 0.6% in Superior.
- A higher percentage of residents in Superior hold a high school diploma at 17.4% compared to 13.5% in Lansing.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Lansing at 10.0%, compared to 7.6% in Superior.
- A higher percentage of residents in Superior hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.8% compared to 19.3% in Lansing.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.