Demographics details for Superior, WI vs Dacula, GA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Superior, WI vs Dacula, GA.
| Data | Superior | Dacula |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 26,459 | 7,460 |
| Median Age | 38.7 years | 35.0 years |
| Median Income | $54,935 | $81,322 |
| Married Families | 33.0% | 39.0% |
| Poverty Level | 11% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.8 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Superior vs Dacula
- In Superior, the population is higher at 26,459, compared to 7,460 in Dacula.
- Residents in Superior have a higher median age of 38.7 years compared to 35.0 years in Dacula.
- Dacula has a higher median income of $81,322, compared to $54,935 in Superior.
- In Dacula, the percentage of married families is higher at 39.0%, compared to 33.0% in Superior.
- Superior has a higher poverty level at 11% compared to 5% in Dacula.
- The unemployment rate in Superior is higher at 3.8%, compared to 3.2% in Dacula.
Demographics
Demographics Superior vs Dacula provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Superior | Dacula |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 23 |
| White | 87 | 41 |
| Asian | 2 | 7 |
| Hispanic | 2 | 19 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 9 |
| American Indian | 2 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Superior vs Dacula
- In Dacula, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 23% compared to 2% in Superior.
- Superior has a higher percentage of White residents at 87% compared to 41% in Dacula.
- In Dacula, the Asian population stands at 7%, greater than 2% in Superior.
- Dacula has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 19%, compared to 2% in Superior.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Dacula at 9%, compared to 5% in Superior.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Superior at 2% compared to 1% in Dacula.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Superior | Dacula |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.7% | 14.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.8% | 9.5% |
| Depression | 24.0% | 19.1% |
| Smoking | 17.3% | 12.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 25.5% | 16.5% |
| Obesity | 36.9% | 29.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 16.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Superior vs Dacula
- More residents in Superior report poor mental health at 15.7% compared to 14.4% in Dacula.
- Depression is more prevalent in Superior at 24.0% compared to 19.1% in Dacula.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Superior at 17.3% compared to 12.9% in Dacula.
- Binge drinking is more common in Superior at 25.5% compared to 16.5% in Dacula.
- Obesity rates are higher in Superior at 36.9% compared to 29.7% in Dacula.
- Disability percentages are the same in both Superior and Dacula at 16.0%.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Superior | Dacula |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.6% (149) | 4.8% (355) |
| High School Diploma | 17.4% (4,616) | 8.0% (599) |
| Less than High School | 7.6% (2,003) | 17.0% (1,267) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 19.8% (5,251) | 13.2% (988) |
Education Levels Comparison: Superior vs Dacula
- In Dacula, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 4.8% compared to 0.6% in Superior.
- A higher percentage of residents in Superior hold a high school diploma at 17.4% compared to 8.0% in Dacula.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Dacula at 17.0%, compared to 7.6% in Superior.
- A higher percentage of residents in Superior hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.8% compared to 13.2% in Dacula.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.