Demographics details for Superior, WI vs Clayton, OK
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Superior, WI vs Clayton, OK.
| Data | Superior | Clayton |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 26,459 | 555 |
| Median Age | 38.7 years | 32.7 years |
| Median Income | $54,935 | $27,083 |
| Married Families | 33.0% | 31.0% |
| Poverty Level | 11% | Data is updating |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.8 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Superior vs Clayton
- In Superior, the population is higher at 26,459, compared to 555 in Clayton.
- Residents in Superior have a higher median age of 38.7 years compared to 32.7 years in Clayton.
- Superior has a higher median income of $54,935 compared to $27,083 in Clayton.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Superior at 33.0% compared to 31.0% in Clayton.
- Superior has a higher poverty level at 11% compared to 0% in Clayton.
- The unemployment rate in Superior is higher at 3.8%, compared to 3.5% in Clayton.
Demographics
Demographics Superior vs Clayton provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Superior | Clayton |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 2 |
| White | 87 | 51 |
| Asian | 2 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 2 | 4 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 23 |
| American Indian | 2 | 20 |
Demographics Comparison: Superior vs Clayton
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Superior and Clayton at 2%.
- Superior has a higher percentage of White residents at 87% compared to 51% in Clayton.
- The Asian population is larger in Superior at 2% compared to 0% in Clayton.
- Clayton has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 4%, compared to 2% in Superior.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Clayton at 23%, compared to 5% in Superior.
- In Clayton, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 20%, compared to 2% in Superior.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Superior | Clayton |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.7% | 21.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.8% | 15.6% |
| Depression | 24.0% | 28.8% |
| Smoking | 17.3% | 26.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 25.5% | 14.4% |
| Obesity | 36.9% | 40.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 37.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Superior vs Clayton
- In Clayton, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 21.5% compared to 15.7% in Superior.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Clayton at 28.8% versus 24.0% in Superior.
- Clayton has a higher smoking rate at 26.6% compared to 17.3% in Superior.
- Binge drinking is more common in Superior at 25.5% compared to 14.4% in Clayton.
- Clayton has higher obesity rates at 40.2% compared to 36.9% in Superior.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Clayton at 37.0% compared to 16.0% in Superior.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Superior | Clayton |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.6% (149) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 17.4% (4,616) | 37.5% (208) |
| Less than High School | 7.6% (2,003) | 19.5% (108) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 19.8% (5,251) | 6.7% (37) |
Education Levels Comparison: Superior vs Clayton
- A higher percentage of residents in Superior have no formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.0% in Clayton.
- In Clayton, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 37.5% compared to 17.4% in Superior.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Clayton at 19.5%, compared to 7.6% in Superior.
- A higher percentage of residents in Superior hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.8% compared to 6.7% in Clayton.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.