Demographics details for Sumter, SC vs Rich hill, MO
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Sumter, SC vs Rich hill, MO.
Data | Sumter | Rich hill |
---|---|---|
Population | 42,757 | 1,244 |
Median Age | 33.1 years | 41.5 years |
Median Income | $48,900 | $43,205 |
Married Families | 34.0% | 48.0% |
Poverty Level | 15% | 12% |
Unemployment Rate | 6.0 | 4.8 |
Population Comparison: Sumter vs Rich hill
- In Sumter, the population is higher at 42,757, compared to 1,244 in Rich hill.
- The median age in Rich hill is higher at 41.5 years, compared to 33.1 years in Sumter.
- Sumter has a higher median income of $48,900 compared to $43,205 in Rich hill.
- In Rich hill, the percentage of married families is higher at 48.0%, compared to 34.0% in Sumter.
- Sumter has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 12% in Rich hill.
- The unemployment rate in Sumter is higher at 6.0%, compared to 4.8% in Rich hill.
Demographics
Demographics Sumter vs Rich hill provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Sumter | Rich hill |
---|---|---|
Black | 48 | 1 |
White | 36 | 91 |
Asian | 2 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 7 | 2 |
Two or More Races | 6 | 5 |
American Indian | 1 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Sumter vs Rich hill
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Sumter at 48% compared to 1% in Rich hill.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Rich hill at 91% compared to 36% in Sumter.
- The Asian population is larger in Sumter at 2% compared to 0% in Rich hill.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Sumter at 7% compared to 2% in Rich hill.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Sumter at 6% compared to 5% in Rich hill.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Sumter and Rich hill at 1%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Sumter | Rich hill |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 18.7% | 19.6% |
Physical Health Not Good | 13.7% | 14.5% |
Depression | 20.9% | 27.2% |
Smoking | 21.7% | 25.1% |
Binge Drinking | 15.2% | 16.8% |
Obesity | 42.5% | 41.0% |
Disability Percentage | 15.0% | 25.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Sumter vs Rich hill
- In Rich hill, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.6% compared to 18.7% in Sumter.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Rich hill at 27.2% versus 20.9% in Sumter.
- Rich hill has a higher smoking rate at 25.1% compared to 21.7% in Sumter.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Rich hill at 16.8% compared to 15.2% in Sumter.
- Obesity rates are higher in Sumter at 42.5% compared to 41.0% in Rich hill.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Rich hill at 25.0% compared to 15.0% in Sumter.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Sumter | Rich hill |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.6% (246) | 1.4% (17) |
High School Diploma | 15.8% (6,741) | 29.9% (372) |
Less than High School | 9.2% (3,936) | 42.6% (530) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 17.5% (7,485) | 7.4% (92) |
Education Levels Comparison: Sumter vs Rich hill
- In Rich hill, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.4% compared to 0.6% in Sumter.
- In Rich hill, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 29.9% compared to 15.8% in Sumter.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Rich hill at 42.6%, compared to 9.2% in Sumter.
- A higher percentage of residents in Sumter hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.5% compared to 7.4% in Rich hill.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.