Demographics details for Sumrall, MS vs Sugar land, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Sumrall, MS vs Sugar land, TX.
| Data | Sumrall | Sugar land |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,911 | 109,414 |
| Median Age | 38.3 years | 42.5 years |
| Median Income | $82,292 | $132,247 |
| Married Families | 58.0% | 52.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 6% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.4 | 4.0 |
Population Comparison: Sumrall vs Sugar land
- The population in Sugar land is higher at 109,414, compared to 1,911 in Sumrall.
- The median age in Sugar land is higher at 42.5 years, compared to 38.3 years in Sumrall.
- Sugar land has a higher median income of $132,247, compared to $82,292 in Sumrall.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Sumrall at 58.0% compared to 52.0% in Sugar land.
- Sumrall has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 6% in Sugar land.
- Sugar land has a higher unemployment rate at 4.0% compared to 3.4% in Sumrall.
Demographics
Demographics Sumrall vs Sugar land provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Sumrall | Sugar land |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 22 | 7 |
| White | 73 | 33 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 39 |
| Hispanic | 2 | 13 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 8 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Sumrall vs Sugar land
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Sumrall at 22% compared to 7% in Sugar land.
- Sumrall has a higher percentage of White residents at 73% compared to 33% in Sugar land.
- In Sugar land, the Asian population stands at 39%, greater than 0% in Sumrall.
- Sugar land has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 13%, compared to 2% in Sumrall.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Sugar land at 8%, compared to 3% in Sumrall.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Sumrall and Sugar land at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Sumrall | Sugar land |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.5% | 12.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.2% | 7.4% |
| Depression | 22.8% | 16.9% |
| Smoking | 16.1% | 9.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.9% | 16.0% |
| Obesity | 37.2% | 25.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 19.0% | 7.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Sumrall vs Sugar land
- More residents in Sumrall report poor mental health at 15.5% compared to 12.5% in Sugar land.
- Depression is more prevalent in Sumrall at 22.8% compared to 16.9% in Sugar land.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Sumrall at 16.1% compared to 9.6% in Sugar land.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Sugar land at 16.0% compared to 15.9% in Sumrall.
- Obesity rates are higher in Sumrall at 37.2% compared to 25.0% in Sugar land.
- Disability percentages are higher in Sumrall at 19.0% compared to 7.0% in Sugar land.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Sumrall | Sugar land |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.5% (10) | 1.2% (1,314) |
| High School Diploma | 15.0% (286) | 7.3% (7,972) |
| Less than High School | 3.5% (67) | 4.3% (4,753) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 17.1% (326) | 42.8% (46,851) |
Education Levels Comparison: Sumrall vs Sugar land
- In Sugar land, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.5% in Sumrall.
- A higher percentage of residents in Sumrall hold a high school diploma at 15.0% compared to 7.3% in Sugar land.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Sugar land at 4.3%, compared to 3.5% in Sumrall.
- In Sugar land, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 42.8% compared to 17.1% in Sumrall.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.