Demographics details for Sumrall, MS vs Massapequa park, NY

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Sumrall, MS vs Massapequa park, NY.

Data Sumrall Massapequa park
Population 1,911 16,873
Median Age 38.3 years 43.7 years
Median Income $82,292 $161,193
Married Families 58.0% 52.0%
Poverty Level 10% Data is updating
Unemployment Rate 3.4 3.5

Population Comparison: Sumrall vs Massapequa park

  • The population in Massapequa park is higher at 16,873, compared to 1,911 in Sumrall.
  • The median age in Massapequa park is higher at 43.7 years, compared to 38.3 years in Sumrall.
  • Massapequa park has a higher median income of $161,193, compared to $82,292 in Sumrall.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Sumrall at 58.0% compared to 52.0% in Massapequa park.
  • Sumrall has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 0% in Massapequa park.
  • Massapequa park has a higher unemployment rate at 3.5% compared to 3.4% in Sumrall.

Demographics

Demographics Sumrall vs Massapequa park provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Sumrall Massapequa park
Black 22 1
White 73 88
Asian Data is updating 2
Hispanic 2 5
Two or More Races 3 4
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Sumrall vs Massapequa park

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Sumrall at 22% compared to 1% in Massapequa park.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Massapequa park at 88% compared to 73% in Sumrall.
  • In Massapequa park, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0% in Sumrall.
  • Massapequa park has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 5%, compared to 2% in Sumrall.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Massapequa park at 4%, compared to 3% in Sumrall.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Sumrall and Massapequa park at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Sumrall Massapequa park
Mental Health Not Good 15.5% 13.7%
Physical Health Not Good 10.2% 8.0%
Depression 22.8% 17.9%
Smoking 16.1% 11.5%
Binge Drinking 15.9% 19.2%
Obesity 37.2% 26.4%
Disability Percentage 19.0% 9.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Sumrall vs Massapequa park

  • More residents in Sumrall report poor mental health at 15.5% compared to 13.7% in Massapequa park.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Sumrall at 22.8% compared to 17.9% in Massapequa park.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Sumrall at 16.1% compared to 11.5% in Massapequa park.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Massapequa park at 19.2% compared to 15.9% in Sumrall.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Sumrall at 37.2% compared to 26.4% in Massapequa park.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Sumrall at 19.0% compared to 9.0% in Massapequa park.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Sumrall Massapequa park
No Schooling 0.5% (10) 0.3% (45)
High School Diploma 15.0% (286) 15.3% (2,586)
Less than High School 3.5% (67) 3.8% (641)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 17.1% (326) 36.6% (6,183)

Education Levels Comparison: Sumrall vs Massapequa park

  • A higher percentage of residents in Sumrall have no formal schooling at 0.5% compared to 0.3% in Massapequa park.
  • In Massapequa park, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 15.3% compared to 15.0% in Sumrall.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Massapequa park at 3.8%, compared to 3.5% in Sumrall.
  • In Massapequa park, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 36.6% compared to 17.1% in Sumrall.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.