Demographics details for Sumrall, MS vs Ho ho kus, NJ
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Sumrall, MS vs Ho ho kus, NJ.
| Data | Sumrall | Ho ho kus |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,911 | 4,216 |
| Median Age | 38.3 years | 43.0 years |
| Median Income | $82,292 | $250,001 |
| Married Families | 58.0% | 52.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | Data is updating |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.4 | 2.5 |
Population Comparison: Sumrall vs Ho ho kus
- The population in Ho ho kus is higher at 4,216, compared to 1,911 in Sumrall.
- The median age in Ho ho kus is higher at 43.0 years, compared to 38.3 years in Sumrall.
- Ho ho kus has a higher median income of $250,001, compared to $82,292 in Sumrall.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Sumrall at 58.0% compared to 52.0% in Ho ho kus.
- Sumrall has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 0% in Ho ho kus.
- The unemployment rate in Sumrall is higher at 3.4%, compared to 2.5% in Ho ho kus.
Demographics
Demographics Sumrall vs Ho ho kus provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Sumrall | Ho ho kus |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 22 | 1 |
| White | 73 | 67 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 12 |
| Hispanic | 2 | 12 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 8 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Sumrall vs Ho ho kus
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Sumrall at 22% compared to 1% in Ho ho kus.
- Sumrall has a higher percentage of White residents at 73% compared to 67% in Ho ho kus.
- In Ho ho kus, the Asian population stands at 12%, greater than 0% in Sumrall.
- Ho ho kus has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 12%, compared to 2% in Sumrall.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Ho ho kus at 8%, compared to 3% in Sumrall.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Sumrall and Ho ho kus at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Sumrall | Ho ho kus |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.5% | 11.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.2% | 5.8% |
| Depression | 22.8% | 16.6% |
| Smoking | 16.1% | 6.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.9% | 19.6% |
| Obesity | 37.2% | 21.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 19.0% | 5.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Sumrall vs Ho ho kus
- More residents in Sumrall report poor mental health at 15.5% compared to 11.2% in Ho ho kus.
- Depression is more prevalent in Sumrall at 22.8% compared to 16.6% in Ho ho kus.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Sumrall at 16.1% compared to 6.9% in Ho ho kus.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Ho ho kus at 19.6% compared to 15.9% in Sumrall.
- Obesity rates are higher in Sumrall at 37.2% compared to 21.9% in Ho ho kus.
- Disability percentages are higher in Sumrall at 19.0% compared to 5.0% in Ho ho kus.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Sumrall | Ho ho kus |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.5% (10) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 15.0% (286) | 2.8% (117) |
| Less than High School | 3.5% (67) | 2.0% (83) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 17.1% (326) | 51.4% (2,167) |
Education Levels Comparison: Sumrall vs Ho ho kus
- A higher percentage of residents in Sumrall have no formal schooling at 0.5% compared to 0.0% in Ho ho kus.
- A higher percentage of residents in Sumrall hold a high school diploma at 15.0% compared to 2.8% in Ho ho kus.
- More residents in Sumrall have less than a high school education at 3.5% compared to 2.0% in Ho ho kus.
- In Ho ho kus, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 51.4% compared to 17.1% in Sumrall.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.