Demographics details for Sumrall, MS vs Fontana, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Sumrall, MS vs Fontana, CA.
| Data | Sumrall | Fontana |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,911 | 212,475 |
| Median Age | 38.3 years | 32.6 years |
| Median Income | $82,292 | $93,230 |
| Married Families | 58.0% | 36.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 13% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.4 | 5.0 |
Population Comparison: Sumrall vs Fontana
- The population in Fontana is higher at 212,475, compared to 1,911 in Sumrall.
- Residents in Sumrall have a higher median age of 38.3 years compared to 32.6 years in Fontana.
- Fontana has a higher median income of $93,230, compared to $82,292 in Sumrall.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Sumrall at 58.0% compared to 36.0% in Fontana.
- The poverty level is higher in Fontana at 13%, compared to 10% in Sumrall.
- Fontana has a higher unemployment rate at 5.0% compared to 3.4% in Sumrall.
Demographics
Demographics Sumrall vs Fontana provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Sumrall | Fontana |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 22 | 8 |
| White | 73 | 2 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 7 |
| Hispanic | 2 | 68 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 14 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Sumrall vs Fontana
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Sumrall at 22% compared to 8% in Fontana.
- Sumrall has a higher percentage of White residents at 73% compared to 2% in Fontana.
- In Fontana, the Asian population stands at 7%, greater than 0% in Sumrall.
- Fontana has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 68%, compared to 2% in Sumrall.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Fontana at 14%, compared to 3% in Sumrall.
- In Fontana, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Sumrall.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Sumrall | Fontana |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.5% | 16.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.2% | 12.6% |
| Depression | 22.8% | 17.0% |
| Smoking | 16.1% | 12.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.9% | 15.1% |
| Obesity | 37.2% | 38.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 19.0% | 8.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Sumrall vs Fontana
- In Fontana, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.2% compared to 15.5% in Sumrall.
- Depression is more prevalent in Sumrall at 22.8% compared to 17.0% in Fontana.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Sumrall at 16.1% compared to 12.4% in Fontana.
- Binge drinking is more common in Sumrall at 15.9% compared to 15.1% in Fontana.
- Fontana has higher obesity rates at 38.6% compared to 37.2% in Sumrall.
- Disability percentages are higher in Sumrall at 19.0% compared to 8.0% in Fontana.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Sumrall | Fontana |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.5% (10) | 2.2% (4,748) |
| High School Diploma | 15.0% (286) | 16.3% (34,556) |
| Less than High School | 3.5% (67) | 25.3% (53,655) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 17.1% (326) | 12.0% (25,587) |
Education Levels Comparison: Sumrall vs Fontana
- In Fontana, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.2% compared to 0.5% in Sumrall.
- In Fontana, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 16.3% compared to 15.0% in Sumrall.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Fontana at 25.3%, compared to 3.5% in Sumrall.
- A higher percentage of residents in Sumrall hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.1% compared to 12.0% in Fontana.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.