Demographics details for Summerfield, OH vs Redford, MI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Summerfield, OH vs Redford, MI.
Data | Summerfield | Redford |
---|---|---|
Population | 242 | 46,899 |
Median Age | 49.8 years | 40.0 years |
Median Income | $29,412 | $59,000 |
Married Families | 36.0% | 57.0% |
Poverty Level | 13% | 10% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.8 |
Population Comparison: Summerfield vs Redford
- The population in Redford is higher at 46,899, compared to 242 in Summerfield.
- Residents in Summerfield have a higher median age of 49.8 years compared to 40.0 years in Redford.
- Redford has a higher median income of $59,000, compared to $29,412 in Summerfield.
- In Redford, the percentage of married families is higher at 57.0%, compared to 36.0% in Summerfield.
- Summerfield has a higher poverty level at 13% compared to 10% in Redford.
- Redford has a higher unemployment rate at 4.8% compared to 3.5% in Summerfield.
Demographics
Demographics Summerfield vs Redford provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Summerfield | Redford |
---|---|---|
Black | Data is updating | 17 |
White | 97 | 74 |
Asian | Data is updating | 4 |
Hispanic | 3 | 5 |
Two or More Races | Data is updating | 5 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Summerfield vs Redford
- In Redford, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 17% compared to 0% in Summerfield.
- Summerfield has a higher percentage of White residents at 97% compared to 74% in Redford.
- In Redford, the Asian population stands at 4%, greater than 0% in Summerfield.
- Redford has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 5%, compared to 3% in Summerfield.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Redford at 5%, compared to 0% in Summerfield.
- In Redford, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Summerfield.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Summerfield | Redford |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 18.1% | Data is updating% |
Physical Health Not Good | 12.3% | Data is updating% |
Depression | 24.2% | Data is updating% |
Smoking | 22.3% | Data is updating% |
Binge Drinking | 17.9% | Data is updating% |
Obesity | 39.2% | Data is updating% |
Disability Percentage | 17.0% | Data is updating% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Summerfield vs Redford
- More residents in Summerfield report poor mental health at 18.1% compared to 0.0% in Redford.
- Depression is more prevalent in Summerfield at 24.2% compared to 0.0% in Redford.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Summerfield at 22.3% compared to 0.0% in Redford.
- Binge drinking is more common in Summerfield at 17.9% compared to 0.0% in Redford.
- Obesity rates are higher in Summerfield at 39.2% compared to 0.0% in Redford.
- Disability percentages are higher in Summerfield at 17.0% compared to 0.0% in Redford.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Summerfield | Redford |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.2% (3) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 31.4% (76) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Less than High School | 17.4% (42) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 2.1% (5) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Education Levels Comparison: Summerfield vs Redford
- A higher percentage of residents in Summerfield have no formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.0% in Redford.
- A higher percentage of residents in Summerfield hold a high school diploma at 31.4% compared to 0.0% in Redford.
- More residents in Summerfield have less than a high school education at 17.4% compared to 0.0% in Redford.
- A higher percentage of residents in Summerfield hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 2.1% compared to 0.0% in Redford.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.