Demographics details for Summerfield, OH vs Reading, PA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Summerfield, OH vs Reading, PA.
| Data | Summerfield | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 242 | 94,858 |
| Median Age | 49.8 years | 31.1 years |
| Median Income | $29,412 | $42,852 |
| Married Families | 36.0% | 22.0% |
| Poverty Level | 13% | 25% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 5.2 |
Population Comparison: Summerfield vs Reading
- The population in Reading is higher at 94,858, compared to 242 in Summerfield.
- Residents in Summerfield have a higher median age of 49.8 years compared to 31.1 years in Reading.
- Reading has a higher median income of $42,852, compared to $29,412 in Summerfield.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Summerfield at 36.0% compared to 22.0% in Reading.
- The poverty level is higher in Reading at 25%, compared to 13% in Summerfield.
- Reading has a higher unemployment rate at 5.2% compared to 3.5% in Summerfield.
Demographics
Demographics Summerfield vs Reading provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Summerfield | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 11 |
| White | 97 | 60 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
| Hispanic | 3 | 67 |
| Two or More Races | Data is updating | 21 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Summerfield vs Reading
- In Reading, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 11% compared to 0% in Summerfield.
- Summerfield has a higher percentage of White residents at 97% compared to 60% in Reading.
- In Reading, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Summerfield.
- Reading has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 67%, compared to 3% in Summerfield.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Reading at 21%, compared to 0% in Summerfield.
- In Reading, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Summerfield.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Summerfield | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.1% | 19.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.3% | 18.1% |
| Depression | 24.2% | 23.1% |
| Smoking | 22.3% | 26.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.9% | 13.0% |
| Obesity | 39.2% | 44.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 17.0% | 20.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Summerfield vs Reading
- In Reading, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.7% compared to 18.1% in Summerfield.
- Depression is more prevalent in Summerfield at 24.2% compared to 23.1% in Reading.
- Reading has a higher smoking rate at 26.5% compared to 22.3% in Summerfield.
- Binge drinking is more common in Summerfield at 17.9% compared to 13.0% in Reading.
- Reading has higher obesity rates at 44.7% compared to 39.2% in Summerfield.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Reading at 20.0% compared to 17.0% in Summerfield.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Summerfield | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.2% (3) | 2.6% (2,442) |
| High School Diploma | 31.4% (76) | 17.8% (16,896) |
| Less than High School | 17.4% (42) | 32.2% (30,522) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 2.1% (5) | 6.9% (6,512) |
Education Levels Comparison: Summerfield vs Reading
- In Reading, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.6% compared to 1.2% in Summerfield.
- A higher percentage of residents in Summerfield hold a high school diploma at 31.4% compared to 17.8% in Reading.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Reading at 32.2%, compared to 17.4% in Summerfield.
- In Reading, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 6.9% compared to 2.1% in Summerfield.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.