Demographics details for Summerfield, OH vs Mokelumne hill, CA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Summerfield, OH vs Mokelumne hill, CA.

Data Summerfield Mokelumne hill
Population 242 808
Median Age 49.8 years 61.8 years
Median Income $29,412 $81,483
Married Families 36.0% 65.0%
Poverty Level 13% 10%
Unemployment Rate 3.5 3.5

Population Comparison: Summerfield vs Mokelumne hill

  • The population in Mokelumne hill is higher at 808, compared to 242 in Summerfield.
  • The median age in Mokelumne hill is higher at 61.8 years, compared to 49.8 years in Summerfield.
  • Mokelumne hill has a higher median income of $81,483, compared to $29,412 in Summerfield.
  • In Mokelumne hill, the percentage of married families is higher at 65.0%, compared to 36.0% in Summerfield.
  • Summerfield has a higher poverty level at 13% compared to 10% in Mokelumne hill.
  • The unemployment rate is the same in both Summerfield and Mokelumne hill at 3.5%.

Demographics

Demographics Summerfield vs Mokelumne hill provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Summerfield Mokelumne hill
Black Data is updating 15
White 97 48
Asian Data is updating Data is updating
Hispanic 3 24
Two or More Races Data is updating 13
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Summerfield vs Mokelumne hill

  • In Mokelumne hill, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 15% compared to 0% in Summerfield.
  • Summerfield has a higher percentage of White residents at 97% compared to 48% in Mokelumne hill.
  • Both Summerfield and Mokelumne hill have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
  • Mokelumne hill has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 24%, compared to 3% in Summerfield.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Mokelumne hill at 13%, compared to 0% in Summerfield.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Summerfield and Mokelumne hill at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Summerfield Mokelumne hill
Mental Health Not Good 18.1% 19.8%
Physical Health Not Good 12.3% 13.6%
Depression 24.2% 24.2%
Smoking 22.3% 17.6%
Binge Drinking 17.9% 16.7%
Obesity 39.2% 32.4%
Disability Percentage 17.0% 9.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Summerfield vs Mokelumne hill

  • In Mokelumne hill, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.8% compared to 18.1% in Summerfield.
  • Both cities have comparable depression rates at 24.2%.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Summerfield at 22.3% compared to 17.6% in Mokelumne hill.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Summerfield at 17.9% compared to 16.7% in Mokelumne hill.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Summerfield at 39.2% compared to 32.4% in Mokelumne hill.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Summerfield at 17.0% compared to 9.0% in Mokelumne hill.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Summerfield Mokelumne hill
No Schooling 1.2% (3) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 31.4% (76) 12.5% (101)
Less than High School 17.4% (42) 8.7% (70)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 2.1% (5) 20.2% (163)

Education Levels Comparison: Summerfield vs Mokelumne hill

  • A higher percentage of residents in Summerfield have no formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.0% in Mokelumne hill.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Summerfield hold a high school diploma at 31.4% compared to 12.5% in Mokelumne hill.
  • More residents in Summerfield have less than a high school education at 17.4% compared to 8.7% in Mokelumne hill.
  • In Mokelumne hill, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 20.2% compared to 2.1% in Summerfield.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.