Demographics details for Summerfield, OH vs Mikado, MI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Summerfield, OH vs Mikado, MI.
Data | Summerfield | Mikado |
---|---|---|
Population | 242 | 820 |
Median Age | 49.8 years | 47.7 years |
Median Income | $29,412 | $46,250 |
Married Families | 36.0% | 42.0% |
Poverty Level | 13% | Data is updating |
Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Summerfield vs Mikado
- The population in Mikado is higher at 820, compared to 242 in Summerfield.
- Residents in Summerfield have a higher median age of 49.8 years compared to 47.7 years in Mikado.
- Mikado has a higher median income of $46,250, compared to $29,412 in Summerfield.
- In Mikado, the percentage of married families is higher at 42.0%, compared to 36.0% in Summerfield.
- Summerfield has a higher poverty level at 13% compared to 0% in Mikado.
- Mikado has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 3.5% in Summerfield.
Demographics
Demographics Summerfield vs Mikado provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Summerfield | Mikado |
---|---|---|
Black | Data is updating | 3 |
White | 97 | 92 |
Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 3 | Data is updating |
Two or More Races | Data is updating | 3 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 2 |
Demographics Comparison: Summerfield vs Mikado
- In Mikado, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 3% compared to 0% in Summerfield.
- Summerfield has a higher percentage of White residents at 97% compared to 92% in Mikado.
- Both Summerfield and Mikado have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Summerfield at 3% compared to 0% in Mikado.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Mikado at 3%, compared to 0% in Summerfield.
- In Mikado, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 0% in Summerfield.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Summerfield | Mikado |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 18.1% | Data is updating% |
Physical Health Not Good | 12.3% | Data is updating% |
Depression | 24.2% | Data is updating% |
Smoking | 22.3% | Data is updating% |
Binge Drinking | 17.9% | Data is updating% |
Obesity | 39.2% | Data is updating% |
Disability Percentage | 17.0% | 24.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Summerfield vs Mikado
- More residents in Summerfield report poor mental health at 18.1% compared to 0.0% in Mikado.
- Depression is more prevalent in Summerfield at 24.2% compared to 0.0% in Mikado.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Summerfield at 22.3% compared to 0.0% in Mikado.
- Binge drinking is more common in Summerfield at 17.9% compared to 0.0% in Mikado.
- Obesity rates are higher in Summerfield at 39.2% compared to 0.0% in Mikado.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Mikado at 24.0% compared to 17.0% in Summerfield.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Summerfield | Mikado |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.2% (3) | 0.7% (6) |
High School Diploma | 31.4% (76) | 24.5% (201) |
Less than High School | 17.4% (42) | 12.7% (104) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 2.1% (5) | 6.1% (50) |
Education Levels Comparison: Summerfield vs Mikado
- A higher percentage of residents in Summerfield have no formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.7% in Mikado.
- A higher percentage of residents in Summerfield hold a high school diploma at 31.4% compared to 24.5% in Mikado.
- More residents in Summerfield have less than a high school education at 17.4% compared to 12.7% in Mikado.
- In Mikado, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 6.1% compared to 2.1% in Summerfield.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.