Demographics details for Summerfield, OH vs Macon, MO
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Summerfield, OH vs Macon, MO.
Data | Summerfield | Macon |
---|---|---|
Population | 242 | 15,049 |
Median Age | 49.8 years | 43.0 years |
Median Income | $29,412 | $54,113 |
Married Families | 36.0% | 43.0% |
Poverty Level | 13% | 14% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Summerfield vs Macon
- The population in Macon is higher at 15,049, compared to 242 in Summerfield.
- Residents in Summerfield have a higher median age of 49.8 years compared to 43.0 years in Macon.
- Macon has a higher median income of $54,113, compared to $29,412 in Summerfield.
- In Macon, the percentage of married families is higher at 43.0%, compared to 36.0% in Summerfield.
- The poverty level is higher in Macon at 14%, compared to 13% in Summerfield.
- Macon has a higher unemployment rate at 4.2% compared to 3.5% in Summerfield.
Demographics
Demographics Summerfield vs Macon provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Summerfield | Macon |
---|---|---|
Black | Data is updating | 2 |
White | 97 | 92 |
Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
Hispanic | 3 | 2 |
Two or More Races | Data is updating | 3 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Summerfield vs Macon
- In Macon, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 2% compared to 0% in Summerfield.
- Summerfield has a higher percentage of White residents at 97% compared to 92% in Macon.
- In Macon, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Summerfield.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Summerfield at 3% compared to 2% in Macon.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Macon at 3%, compared to 0% in Summerfield.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Summerfield and Macon at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Summerfield | Macon |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 18.1% | 17.8% |
Physical Health Not Good | 12.3% | 12.7% |
Depression | 24.2% | 24.4% |
Smoking | 22.3% | 21.8% |
Binge Drinking | 17.9% | 18.7% |
Obesity | 39.2% | 41.6% |
Disability Percentage | 17.0% | 17.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Summerfield vs Macon
- More residents in Summerfield report poor mental health at 18.1% compared to 17.8% in Macon.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Macon at 24.4% versus 24.2% in Summerfield.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Summerfield at 22.3% compared to 21.8% in Macon.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Macon at 18.7% compared to 17.9% in Summerfield.
- Macon has higher obesity rates at 41.6% compared to 39.2% in Summerfield.
- Disability percentages are the same in both Summerfield and Macon at 17.0%.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Summerfield | Macon |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.2% (3) | 0.3% (46) |
High School Diploma | 31.4% (76) | 27.6% (4,161) |
Less than High School | 17.4% (42) | 11.8% (1,769) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 2.1% (5) | 12.1% (1,823) |
Education Levels Comparison: Summerfield vs Macon
- A higher percentage of residents in Summerfield have no formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.3% in Macon.
- A higher percentage of residents in Summerfield hold a high school diploma at 31.4% compared to 27.6% in Macon.
- More residents in Summerfield have less than a high school education at 17.4% compared to 11.8% in Macon.
- In Macon, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 12.1% compared to 2.1% in Summerfield.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.