Demographics details for Summerfield, OH vs Livermore, ME

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Summerfield, OH vs Livermore, ME.

Data Summerfield Livermore
Population 242 2,120
Median Age 49.8 years 45.0 years
Median Income $29,412 $55,000
Married Families 36.0% 60.0%
Poverty Level 13% 12%
Unemployment Rate 3.5 3.3

Population Comparison: Summerfield vs Livermore

  • The population in Livermore is higher at 2,120, compared to 242 in Summerfield.
  • Residents in Summerfield have a higher median age of 49.8 years compared to 45.0 years in Livermore.
  • Livermore has a higher median income of $55,000, compared to $29,412 in Summerfield.
  • In Livermore, the percentage of married families is higher at 60.0%, compared to 36.0% in Summerfield.
  • Summerfield has a higher poverty level at 13% compared to 12% in Livermore.
  • The unemployment rate in Summerfield is higher at 3.5%, compared to 3.3% in Livermore.

Demographics

Demographics Summerfield vs Livermore provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Summerfield Livermore
Black Data is updating 1
White 97 97
Asian Data is updating 1
Hispanic 3 1
Two or More Races Data is updating Data is updating
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Summerfield vs Livermore

  • In Livermore, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 1% compared to 0% in Summerfield.
  • The percentage of White residents is the same in both Summerfield and Livermore at 97%.
  • In Livermore, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Summerfield.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Summerfield at 3% compared to 1% in Livermore.
  • Both Summerfield and Livermore have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 0%.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Summerfield and Livermore at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Summerfield Livermore
Mental Health Not Good 18.1% Data is updating%
Physical Health Not Good 12.3% Data is updating%
Depression 24.2% Data is updating%
Smoking 22.3% Data is updating%
Binge Drinking 17.9% Data is updating%
Obesity 39.2% Data is updating%
Disability Percentage 17.0% Data is updating%

Health Statistics Comparison: Summerfield vs Livermore

  • More residents in Summerfield report poor mental health at 18.1% compared to 0.0% in Livermore.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Summerfield at 24.2% compared to 0.0% in Livermore.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Summerfield at 22.3% compared to 0.0% in Livermore.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Summerfield at 17.9% compared to 0.0% in Livermore.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Summerfield at 39.2% compared to 0.0% in Livermore.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Summerfield at 17.0% compared to 0.0% in Livermore.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Summerfield Livermore
No Schooling 1.2% (3) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 31.4% (76) 0.0% (Data is updating)
Less than High School 17.4% (42) 0.0% (Data is updating)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 2.1% (5) 0.0% (Data is updating)

Education Levels Comparison: Summerfield vs Livermore

  • A higher percentage of residents in Summerfield have no formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.0% in Livermore.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Summerfield hold a high school diploma at 31.4% compared to 0.0% in Livermore.
  • More residents in Summerfield have less than a high school education at 17.4% compared to 0.0% in Livermore.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Summerfield hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 2.1% compared to 0.0% in Livermore.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.