Environment details: Summerfield OH
generally good quality; useable for all.
Environment details: Laurel MT
poor quality, requires immediate attention.
Compare Environment: Summerfield OH vs Laurel MT
Environmental and Climate Insights
Understanding environmental and climate factors is crucial for assessing the sustainability and livability of a city or town. Key metrics such as CO2 emissions, water quality, and air quality indices provide valuable insights into the local environmental conditions. Evaluating these factors helps in making informed decisions about living and investing in a community.
| Metric | Summerfield | Laurel |
|---|---|---|
| CO2 Emissions | 1552 | 228 |
| Water Quality | 7/10 | 4/10 |
| Water Quality Explanation | generally good quality; useable for all. | poor quality, requires immediate attention. |
| Median Air Quality | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| Average Air Quality Index | 1.65 | 1.77 |
| Worst AQI | 4.0 | 5.0 |
| Days with Poor AQI | 29 | 40 |
Environmental Insights Comparison: Summerfield vs Laurel
- Water quality is rated higher in Summerfield at 7/10 compared to 4/10 in Laurel.
- Median air quality indexes are identical in both cities at 2.0.
- Air quality is better in Laurel with an average index of 1.77 compared to 1.65 in Summerfield.
- Laurel experiences more days with poor air quality at 40 compared to 29 in Summerfield.
Overview of the Place
Gaining a comprehensive understanding of a place is crucial for making informed decisions about living or investing there. Factors such as local culture, economic conditions, and community dynamics play a significant role in shaping the overall experience. For a quick understanding of the data behind this place, we recommend checking out the page.