Demographics details for Summerfield, OH vs Crawfordsville, IN

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Summerfield, OH vs Crawfordsville, IN.

Data Summerfield Crawfordsville
Population 242 16,479
Median Age 49.8 years 36.7 years
Median Income $29,412 $46,918
Married Families 36.0% 32.0%
Poverty Level 13% 13%
Unemployment Rate 3.5 3.5

Population Comparison: Summerfield vs Crawfordsville

  • The population in Crawfordsville is higher at 16,479, compared to 242 in Summerfield.
  • Residents in Summerfield have a higher median age of 49.8 years compared to 36.7 years in Crawfordsville.
  • Crawfordsville has a higher median income of $46,918, compared to $29,412 in Summerfield.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Summerfield at 36.0% compared to 32.0% in Crawfordsville.
  • The poverty level is identical in both Summerfield and Crawfordsville at 13%.
  • The unemployment rate is the same in both Summerfield and Crawfordsville at 3.5%.

Demographics

Demographics Summerfield vs Crawfordsville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Summerfield Crawfordsville
Black Data is updating 1
White 97 84
Asian Data is updating 1
Hispanic 3 8
Two or More Races Data is updating 6
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Summerfield vs Crawfordsville

  • In Crawfordsville, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 1% compared to 0% in Summerfield.
  • Summerfield has a higher percentage of White residents at 97% compared to 84% in Crawfordsville.
  • In Crawfordsville, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Summerfield.
  • Crawfordsville has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 8%, compared to 3% in Summerfield.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Crawfordsville at 6%, compared to 0% in Summerfield.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Summerfield and Crawfordsville at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Summerfield Crawfordsville
Mental Health Not Good 18.1% 17.7%
Physical Health Not Good 12.3% 12.9%
Depression 24.2% 26.1%
Smoking 22.3% 21.8%
Binge Drinking 17.9% 16.6%
Obesity 39.2% 37.0%
Disability Percentage 17.0% 18.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Summerfield vs Crawfordsville

  • More residents in Summerfield report poor mental health at 18.1% compared to 17.7% in Crawfordsville.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Crawfordsville at 26.1% versus 24.2% in Summerfield.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Summerfield at 22.3% compared to 21.8% in Crawfordsville.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Summerfield at 17.9% compared to 16.6% in Crawfordsville.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Summerfield at 39.2% compared to 37.0% in Crawfordsville.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Crawfordsville at 18.0% compared to 17.0% in Summerfield.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Summerfield Crawfordsville
No Schooling 1.2% (3) 0.7% (114)
High School Diploma 31.4% (76) 23.1% (3,814)
Less than High School 17.4% (42) 19.9% (3,274)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 2.1% (5) 10.4% (1,714)

Education Levels Comparison: Summerfield vs Crawfordsville

  • A higher percentage of residents in Summerfield have no formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.7% in Crawfordsville.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Summerfield hold a high school diploma at 31.4% compared to 23.1% in Crawfordsville.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Crawfordsville at 19.9%, compared to 17.4% in Summerfield.
  • In Crawfordsville, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 10.4% compared to 2.1% in Summerfield.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.