Demographics details for Summerfield, OH vs Crab orchard, KY

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Summerfield, OH vs Crab orchard, KY.

Data Summerfield Crab orchard
Population 242 743
Median Age 49.8 years 38.9 years
Median Income $29,412 $27,721
Married Families 36.0% 36.0%
Poverty Level 13% 16%
Unemployment Rate 3.5 6.1

Population Comparison: Summerfield vs Crab orchard

  • The population in Crab orchard is higher at 743, compared to 242 in Summerfield.
  • Residents in Summerfield have a higher median age of 49.8 years compared to 38.9 years in Crab orchard.
  • Summerfield has a higher median income of $29,412 compared to $27,721 in Crab orchard.
  • The percentage of married families is the same in both Summerfield and Crab orchard at 36.0%.
  • The poverty level is higher in Crab orchard at 16%, compared to 13% in Summerfield.
  • Crab orchard has a higher unemployment rate at 6.1% compared to 3.5% in Summerfield.

Demographics

Demographics Summerfield vs Crab orchard provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Summerfield Crab orchard
Black Data is updating 1
White 97 89
Asian Data is updating Data is updating
Hispanic 3 7
Two or More Races Data is updating 3
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Summerfield vs Crab orchard

  • In Crab orchard, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 1% compared to 0% in Summerfield.
  • Summerfield has a higher percentage of White residents at 97% compared to 89% in Crab orchard.
  • Both Summerfield and Crab orchard have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
  • Crab orchard has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 7%, compared to 3% in Summerfield.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Crab orchard at 3%, compared to 0% in Summerfield.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Summerfield and Crab orchard at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Summerfield Crab orchard
Mental Health Not Good 18.1% 22.8%
Physical Health Not Good 12.3% 18.3%
Depression 24.2% 32.5%
Smoking 22.3% 30.6%
Binge Drinking 17.9% 13.9%
Obesity 39.2% 42.0%
Disability Percentage 17.0% 21.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Summerfield vs Crab orchard

  • In Crab orchard, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 22.8% compared to 18.1% in Summerfield.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Crab orchard at 32.5% versus 24.2% in Summerfield.
  • Crab orchard has a higher smoking rate at 30.6% compared to 22.3% in Summerfield.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Summerfield at 17.9% compared to 13.9% in Crab orchard.
  • Crab orchard has higher obesity rates at 42.0% compared to 39.2% in Summerfield.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Crab orchard at 21.0% compared to 17.0% in Summerfield.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Summerfield Crab orchard
No Schooling 1.2% (3) 0.1% (1)
High School Diploma 31.4% (76) 25.8% (192)
Less than High School 17.4% (42) 26.9% (200)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 2.1% (5) 2.6% (19)

Education Levels Comparison: Summerfield vs Crab orchard

  • A higher percentage of residents in Summerfield have no formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.1% in Crab orchard.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Summerfield hold a high school diploma at 31.4% compared to 25.8% in Crab orchard.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Crab orchard at 26.9%, compared to 17.4% in Summerfield.
  • In Crab orchard, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 2.6% compared to 2.1% in Summerfield.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.