Demographics details for Summerfield, NC vs Red bay, AL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Summerfield, NC vs Red bay, AL.
Data | Summerfield | Red bay |
---|---|---|
Population | 11,111 | 3,205 |
Median Age | 45.1 years | 46.3 years |
Median Income | $148,182 | $33,234 |
Married Families | 52.0% | 32.0% |
Poverty Level | 7% | 10% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.4 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Summerfield vs Red bay
- In Summerfield, the population is higher at 11,111, compared to 3,205 in Red bay.
- The median age in Red bay is higher at 46.3 years, compared to 45.1 years in Summerfield.
- Summerfield has a higher median income of $148,182 compared to $33,234 in Red bay.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Summerfield at 52.0% compared to 32.0% in Red bay.
- The poverty level is higher in Red bay at 10%, compared to 7% in Summerfield.
- Red bay has a higher unemployment rate at 3.5% compared to 3.4% in Summerfield.
Demographics
Demographics Summerfield vs Red bay provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Summerfield | Red bay |
---|---|---|
Black | 5 | Data is updating |
White | 82 | 87 |
Asian | 4 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 5 | 7 |
Two or More Races | 4 | 6 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Summerfield vs Red bay
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Summerfield at 5% compared to 0% in Red bay.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Red bay at 87% compared to 82% in Summerfield.
- The Asian population is larger in Summerfield at 4% compared to 0% in Red bay.
- Red bay has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 7%, compared to 5% in Summerfield.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Red bay at 6%, compared to 4% in Summerfield.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Summerfield and Red bay at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Summerfield | Red bay |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 13.0% | 20.9% |
Physical Health Not Good | 8.2% | 14.8% |
Depression | 22.6% | 26.5% |
Smoking | 10.6% | 23.2% |
Binge Drinking | 19.5% | 15.2% |
Obesity | 28.7% | 38.3% |
Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 21.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Summerfield vs Red bay
- In Red bay, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.9% compared to 13.0% in Summerfield.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Red bay at 26.5% versus 22.6% in Summerfield.
- Red bay has a higher smoking rate at 23.2% compared to 10.6% in Summerfield.
- Binge drinking is more common in Summerfield at 19.5% compared to 15.2% in Red bay.
- Red bay has higher obesity rates at 38.3% compared to 28.7% in Summerfield.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Red bay at 21.0% compared to 12.0% in Summerfield.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Summerfield | Red bay |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.0% (109) | 0.4% (14) |
High School Diploma | 8.8% (973) | 29.0% (930) |
Less than High School | 6.1% (674) | 27.0% (866) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 38.9% (4,326) | 11.6% (372) |
Education Levels Comparison: Summerfield vs Red bay
- A higher percentage of residents in Summerfield have no formal schooling at 1.0% compared to 0.4% in Red bay.
- In Red bay, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 29.0% compared to 8.8% in Summerfield.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Red bay at 27.0%, compared to 6.1% in Summerfield.
- A higher percentage of residents in Summerfield hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 38.9% compared to 11.6% in Red bay.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.