Demographics details for Summerfield, NC vs Milledgeville, GA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Summerfield, NC vs Milledgeville, GA.

Data Summerfield Milledgeville
Population 11,111 16,837
Median Age 45.1 years 26.5 years
Median Income $148,182 $40,672
Married Families 52.0% 20.0%
Poverty Level 7% 24%
Unemployment Rate 3.4 4.5

Population Comparison: Summerfield vs Milledgeville

  • The population in Milledgeville is higher at 16,837, compared to 11,111 in Summerfield.
  • Residents in Summerfield have a higher median age of 45.1 years compared to 26.5 years in Milledgeville.
  • Summerfield has a higher median income of $148,182 compared to $40,672 in Milledgeville.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Summerfield at 52.0% compared to 20.0% in Milledgeville.
  • The poverty level is higher in Milledgeville at 24%, compared to 7% in Summerfield.
  • Milledgeville has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 3.4% in Summerfield.

Demographics

Demographics Summerfield vs Milledgeville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Summerfield Milledgeville
Black 5 45
White 82 47
Asian 4 3
Hispanic 5 3
Two or More Races 4 2
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Summerfield vs Milledgeville

  • In Milledgeville, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 45% compared to 5% in Summerfield.
  • Summerfield has a higher percentage of White residents at 82% compared to 47% in Milledgeville.
  • The Asian population is larger in Summerfield at 4% compared to 3% in Milledgeville.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Summerfield at 5% compared to 3% in Milledgeville.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Summerfield at 4% compared to 2% in Milledgeville.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Summerfield and Milledgeville at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Summerfield Milledgeville
Mental Health Not Good 13.0% 18.3%
Physical Health Not Good 8.2% 14.1%
Depression 22.6% 20.6%
Smoking 10.6% 21.1%
Binge Drinking 19.5% 14.2%
Obesity 28.7% 42.7%
Disability Percentage 12.0% 13.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Summerfield vs Milledgeville

  • In Milledgeville, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.3% compared to 13.0% in Summerfield.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Summerfield at 22.6% compared to 20.6% in Milledgeville.
  • Milledgeville has a higher smoking rate at 21.1% compared to 10.6% in Summerfield.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Summerfield at 19.5% compared to 14.2% in Milledgeville.
  • Milledgeville has higher obesity rates at 42.7% compared to 28.7% in Summerfield.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Milledgeville at 13.0% compared to 12.0% in Summerfield.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Summerfield Milledgeville
No Schooling 1.0% (109) 0.8% (139)
High School Diploma 8.8% (973) 11.0% (1,844)
Less than High School 6.1% (674) 12.1% (2,041)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 38.9% (4,326) 13.3% (2,237)

Education Levels Comparison: Summerfield vs Milledgeville

  • A higher percentage of residents in Summerfield have no formal schooling at 1.0% compared to 0.8% in Milledgeville.
  • In Milledgeville, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 11.0% compared to 8.8% in Summerfield.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Milledgeville at 12.1%, compared to 6.1% in Summerfield.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Summerfield hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 38.9% compared to 13.3% in Milledgeville.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.