Demographics details for Summerfield, NC vs Godley, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Summerfield, NC vs Godley, TX.
| Data | Summerfield | Godley |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 11,111 | 2,674 |
| Median Age | 45.1 years | 33.7 years |
| Median Income | $148,182 | $56,792 |
| Married Families | 52.0% | 33.0% |
| Poverty Level | 7% | 11% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.4 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Summerfield vs Godley
- In Summerfield, the population is higher at 11,111, compared to 2,674 in Godley.
- Residents in Summerfield have a higher median age of 45.1 years compared to 33.7 years in Godley.
- Summerfield has a higher median income of $148,182 compared to $56,792 in Godley.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Summerfield at 52.0% compared to 33.0% in Godley.
- The poverty level is higher in Godley at 11%, compared to 7% in Summerfield.
- The unemployment rate in Summerfield is higher at 3.4%, compared to 3.2% in Godley.
Demographics
Demographics Summerfield vs Godley provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Summerfield | Godley |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 5 | 1 |
| White | 82 | 81 |
| Asian | 4 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 5 | 15 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 3 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Summerfield vs Godley
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Summerfield at 5% compared to 1% in Godley.
- Summerfield has a higher percentage of White residents at 82% compared to 81% in Godley.
- The Asian population is larger in Summerfield at 4% compared to 0% in Godley.
- Godley has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 15%, compared to 5% in Summerfield.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Summerfield at 4% compared to 3% in Godley.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Summerfield and Godley at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Summerfield | Godley |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 13.0% | 17.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 8.2% | 11.4% |
| Depression | 22.6% | 24.3% |
| Smoking | 10.6% | 18.1% |
| Binge Drinking | 19.5% | 19.7% |
| Obesity | 28.7% | 34.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 4.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Summerfield vs Godley
- In Godley, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.8% compared to 13.0% in Summerfield.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Godley at 24.3% versus 22.6% in Summerfield.
- Godley has a higher smoking rate at 18.1% compared to 10.6% in Summerfield.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Godley at 19.7% compared to 19.5% in Summerfield.
- Godley has higher obesity rates at 34.6% compared to 28.7% in Summerfield.
- Disability percentages are higher in Summerfield at 12.0% compared to 4.0% in Godley.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Summerfield | Godley |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.0% (109) | 1.0% (27) |
| High School Diploma | 8.8% (973) | 13.1% (350) |
| Less than High School | 6.1% (674) | 9.7% (260) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 38.9% (4,326) | 6.4% (171) |
Education Levels Comparison: Summerfield vs Godley
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Summerfield and Godley at 1.0%.
- In Godley, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 13.1% compared to 8.8% in Summerfield.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Godley at 9.7%, compared to 6.1% in Summerfield.
- A higher percentage of residents in Summerfield hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 38.9% compared to 6.4% in Godley.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.