Demographics details for Summerfield, NC vs Gibsonburg, OH
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Summerfield, NC vs Gibsonburg, OH.
| Data | Summerfield | Gibsonburg |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 11,111 | 2,436 |
| Median Age | 45.1 years | 38.7 years |
| Median Income | $148,182 | $67,279 |
| Married Families | 52.0% | 44.0% |
| Poverty Level | 7% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.4 | 4.3 |
Population Comparison: Summerfield vs Gibsonburg
- In Summerfield, the population is higher at 11,111, compared to 2,436 in Gibsonburg.
- Residents in Summerfield have a higher median age of 45.1 years compared to 38.7 years in Gibsonburg.
- Summerfield has a higher median income of $148,182 compared to $67,279 in Gibsonburg.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Summerfield at 52.0% compared to 44.0% in Gibsonburg.
- The poverty level is higher in Gibsonburg at 10%, compared to 7% in Summerfield.
- Gibsonburg has a higher unemployment rate at 4.3% compared to 3.4% in Summerfield.
Demographics
Demographics Summerfield vs Gibsonburg provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Summerfield | Gibsonburg |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 5 | 2 |
| White | 82 | 79 |
| Asian | 4 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 5 | 10 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 9 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Summerfield vs Gibsonburg
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Summerfield at 5% compared to 2% in Gibsonburg.
- Summerfield has a higher percentage of White residents at 82% compared to 79% in Gibsonburg.
- The Asian population is larger in Summerfield at 4% compared to 0% in Gibsonburg.
- Gibsonburg has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 10%, compared to 5% in Summerfield.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Gibsonburg at 9%, compared to 4% in Summerfield.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Summerfield and Gibsonburg at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Summerfield | Gibsonburg |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 13.0% | 17.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 8.2% | 12.3% |
| Depression | 22.6% | 23.0% |
| Smoking | 10.6% | 21.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 19.5% | 18.4% |
| Obesity | 28.7% | 42.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Summerfield vs Gibsonburg
- In Gibsonburg, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.6% compared to 13.0% in Summerfield.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Gibsonburg at 23.0% versus 22.6% in Summerfield.
- Gibsonburg has a higher smoking rate at 21.9% compared to 10.6% in Summerfield.
- Binge drinking is more common in Summerfield at 19.5% compared to 18.4% in Gibsonburg.
- Gibsonburg has higher obesity rates at 42.4% compared to 28.7% in Summerfield.
- Disability percentages are higher in Summerfield at 12.0% compared to 11.0% in Gibsonburg.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Summerfield | Gibsonburg |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.0% (109) | 0.2% (4) |
| High School Diploma | 8.8% (973) | 35.6% (867) |
| Less than High School | 6.1% (674) | 5.1% (125) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 38.9% (4,326) | 11.3% (275) |
Education Levels Comparison: Summerfield vs Gibsonburg
- A higher percentage of residents in Summerfield have no formal schooling at 1.0% compared to 0.2% in Gibsonburg.
- In Gibsonburg, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 35.6% compared to 8.8% in Summerfield.
- More residents in Summerfield have less than a high school education at 6.1% compared to 5.1% in Gibsonburg.
- A higher percentage of residents in Summerfield hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 38.9% compared to 11.3% in Gibsonburg.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.