Demographics details for Summerfield, NC vs Fort smith, AR

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Summerfield, NC vs Fort smith, AR.

Data Summerfield Fort smith
Population 11,111 89,992
Median Age 45.1 years 36.4 years
Median Income $148,182 $50,799
Married Families 52.0% 36.0%
Poverty Level 7% 12%
Unemployment Rate 3.4 3.7

Population Comparison: Summerfield vs Fort smith

  • The population in Fort smith is higher at 89,992, compared to 11,111 in Summerfield.
  • Residents in Summerfield have a higher median age of 45.1 years compared to 36.4 years in Fort smith.
  • Summerfield has a higher median income of $148,182 compared to $50,799 in Fort smith.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Summerfield at 52.0% compared to 36.0% in Fort smith.
  • The poverty level is higher in Fort smith at 12%, compared to 7% in Summerfield.
  • Fort smith has a higher unemployment rate at 3.7% compared to 3.4% in Summerfield.

Demographics

Demographics Summerfield vs Fort smith provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Summerfield Fort smith
Black 5 8
White 82 57
Asian 4 6
Hispanic 5 19
Two or More Races 4 9
American Indian Data is updating 1

Demographics Comparison: Summerfield vs Fort smith

  • In Fort smith, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 8% compared to 5% in Summerfield.
  • Summerfield has a higher percentage of White residents at 82% compared to 57% in Fort smith.
  • In Fort smith, the Asian population stands at 6%, greater than 4% in Summerfield.
  • Fort smith has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 19%, compared to 5% in Summerfield.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Fort smith at 9%, compared to 4% in Summerfield.
  • In Fort smith, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Summerfield.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Summerfield Fort smith
Mental Health Not Good 13.0% 19.6%
Physical Health Not Good 8.2% 14.7%
Depression 22.6% 27.8%
Smoking 10.6% 21.8%
Binge Drinking 19.5% 13.2%
Obesity 28.7% 39.5%
Disability Percentage 12.0% 20.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Summerfield vs Fort smith

  • In Fort smith, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.6% compared to 13.0% in Summerfield.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Fort smith at 27.8% versus 22.6% in Summerfield.
  • Fort smith has a higher smoking rate at 21.8% compared to 10.6% in Summerfield.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Summerfield at 19.5% compared to 13.2% in Fort smith.
  • Fort smith has higher obesity rates at 39.5% compared to 28.7% in Summerfield.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Fort smith at 20.0% compared to 12.0% in Summerfield.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Summerfield Fort smith
No Schooling 1.0% (109) 2.3% (2,029)
High School Diploma 8.8% (973) 14.8% (13,356)
Less than High School 6.1% (674) 19.8% (17,822)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 38.9% (4,326) 16.4% (14,745)

Education Levels Comparison: Summerfield vs Fort smith

  • In Fort smith, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.3% compared to 1.0% in Summerfield.
  • In Fort smith, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 14.8% compared to 8.8% in Summerfield.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Fort smith at 19.8%, compared to 6.1% in Summerfield.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Summerfield hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 38.9% compared to 16.4% in Fort smith.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.