Demographics details for Summerfield, NC vs Colleyville, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Summerfield, NC vs Colleyville, TX.
Data | Summerfield | Colleyville |
---|---|---|
Population | 11,111 | 25,850 |
Median Age | 45.1 years | 47.3 years |
Median Income | $148,182 | $196,298 |
Married Families | 52.0% | 58.0% |
Poverty Level | 7% | Data is updating |
Unemployment Rate | 3.4 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Summerfield vs Colleyville
- The population in Colleyville is higher at 25,850, compared to 11,111 in Summerfield.
- The median age in Colleyville is higher at 47.3 years, compared to 45.1 years in Summerfield.
- Colleyville has a higher median income of $196,298, compared to $148,182 in Summerfield.
- In Colleyville, the percentage of married families is higher at 58.0%, compared to 52.0% in Summerfield.
- Summerfield has a higher poverty level at 7% compared to 0% in Colleyville.
- Colleyville has a higher unemployment rate at 3.5% compared to 3.4% in Summerfield.
Demographics
Demographics Summerfield vs Colleyville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Summerfield | Colleyville |
---|---|---|
Black | 5 | 4 |
White | 82 | 72 |
Asian | 4 | 8 |
Hispanic | 5 | 8 |
Two or More Races | 4 | 8 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Summerfield vs Colleyville
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Summerfield at 5% compared to 4% in Colleyville.
- Summerfield has a higher percentage of White residents at 82% compared to 72% in Colleyville.
- In Colleyville, the Asian population stands at 8%, greater than 4% in Summerfield.
- Colleyville has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 8%, compared to 5% in Summerfield.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Colleyville at 8%, compared to 4% in Summerfield.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Summerfield and Colleyville at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Summerfield | Colleyville |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 13.0% | 13.0% |
Physical Health Not Good | 8.2% | 7.3% |
Depression | 22.6% | 21.5% |
Smoking | 10.6% | 8.7% |
Binge Drinking | 19.5% | 19.5% |
Obesity | 28.7% | 27.3% |
Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 6.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Summerfield vs Colleyville
- Poor mental health levels are equal in both Summerfield and Colleyville at 13.0%.
- Depression is more prevalent in Summerfield at 22.6% compared to 21.5% in Colleyville.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Summerfield at 10.6% compared to 8.7% in Colleyville.
- Binge drinking rates are similar in both Summerfield and Colleyville at 19.5%.
- Obesity rates are higher in Summerfield at 28.7% compared to 27.3% in Colleyville.
- Disability percentages are higher in Summerfield at 12.0% compared to 6.0% in Colleyville.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Summerfield | Colleyville |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.0% (109) | 0.2% (47) |
High School Diploma | 8.8% (973) | 3.6% (936) |
Less than High School | 6.1% (674) | 0.8% (208) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 38.9% (4,326) | 49.3% (12,744) |
Education Levels Comparison: Summerfield vs Colleyville
- A higher percentage of residents in Summerfield have no formal schooling at 1.0% compared to 0.2% in Colleyville.
- A higher percentage of residents in Summerfield hold a high school diploma at 8.8% compared to 3.6% in Colleyville.
- More residents in Summerfield have less than a high school education at 6.1% compared to 0.8% in Colleyville.
- In Colleyville, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 49.3% compared to 38.9% in Summerfield.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.