Demographics details for Summerfield, NC vs Canton, MS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Summerfield, NC vs Canton, MS.
| Data | Summerfield | Canton |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 11,111 | 10,744 |
| Median Age | 45.1 years | 35.6 years |
| Median Income | $148,182 | $33,411 |
| Married Families | 52.0% | 20.0% |
| Poverty Level | 7% | 19% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.4 | 5.2 |
Population Comparison: Summerfield vs Canton
- In Summerfield, the population is higher at 11,111, compared to 10,744 in Canton.
- Residents in Summerfield have a higher median age of 45.1 years compared to 35.6 years in Canton.
- Summerfield has a higher median income of $148,182 compared to $33,411 in Canton.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Summerfield at 52.0% compared to 20.0% in Canton.
- The poverty level is higher in Canton at 19%, compared to 7% in Summerfield.
- Canton has a higher unemployment rate at 5.2% compared to 3.4% in Summerfield.
Demographics
Demographics Summerfield vs Canton provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Summerfield | Canton |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 5 | 76 |
| White | 82 | 16 |
| Asian | 4 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 5 | 7 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 1 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Summerfield vs Canton
- In Canton, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 76% compared to 5% in Summerfield.
- Summerfield has a higher percentage of White residents at 82% compared to 16% in Canton.
- The Asian population is larger in Summerfield at 4% compared to 0% in Canton.
- Canton has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 7%, compared to 5% in Summerfield.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Summerfield at 4% compared to 1% in Canton.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Summerfield and Canton at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Summerfield | Canton |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 13.0% | 17.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 8.2% | 14.3% |
| Depression | 22.6% | 18.8% |
| Smoking | 10.6% | 21.7% |
| Binge Drinking | 19.5% | 12.6% |
| Obesity | 28.7% | 45.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Summerfield vs Canton
- In Canton, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.6% compared to 13.0% in Summerfield.
- Depression is more prevalent in Summerfield at 22.6% compared to 18.8% in Canton.
- Canton has a higher smoking rate at 21.7% compared to 10.6% in Summerfield.
- Binge drinking is more common in Summerfield at 19.5% compared to 12.6% in Canton.
- Canton has higher obesity rates at 45.8% compared to 28.7% in Summerfield.
- Disability percentages are the same in both Summerfield and Canton at 12.0%.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Summerfield | Canton |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.0% (109) | 1.0% (103) |
| High School Diploma | 8.8% (973) | 17.6% (1,891) |
| Less than High School | 6.1% (674) | 17.2% (1,853) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 38.9% (4,326) | 14.8% (1,587) |
Education Levels Comparison: Summerfield vs Canton
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Summerfield and Canton at 1.0%.
- In Canton, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 17.6% compared to 8.8% in Summerfield.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Canton at 17.2%, compared to 6.1% in Summerfield.
- A higher percentage of residents in Summerfield hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 38.9% compared to 14.8% in Canton.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.