Demographics details for Summerfield, NC vs Burnham, PA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Summerfield, NC vs Burnham, PA.
| Data | Summerfield | Burnham |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 11,111 | 1,972 |
| Median Age | 45.1 years | 41.1 years |
| Median Income | $148,182 | $58,929 |
| Married Families | 52.0% | 36.0% |
| Poverty Level | 7% | 14% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.4 | 5.5 |
Population Comparison: Summerfield vs Burnham
- In Summerfield, the population is higher at 11,111, compared to 1,972 in Burnham.
- Residents in Summerfield have a higher median age of 45.1 years compared to 41.1 years in Burnham.
- Summerfield has a higher median income of $148,182 compared to $58,929 in Burnham.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Summerfield at 52.0% compared to 36.0% in Burnham.
- The poverty level is higher in Burnham at 14%, compared to 7% in Summerfield.
- Burnham has a higher unemployment rate at 5.5% compared to 3.4% in Summerfield.
Demographics
Demographics Summerfield vs Burnham provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Summerfield | Burnham |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 5 | 3 |
| White | 82 | 94 |
| Asian | 4 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 5 | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 3 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Summerfield vs Burnham
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Summerfield at 5% compared to 3% in Burnham.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Burnham at 94% compared to 82% in Summerfield.
- The Asian population is larger in Summerfield at 4% compared to 0% in Burnham.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Summerfield at 5% compared to 0% in Burnham.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Summerfield at 4% compared to 3% in Burnham.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Summerfield and Burnham at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Summerfield | Burnham |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 13.0% | 18.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 8.2% | 12.6% |
| Depression | 22.6% | 24.6% |
| Smoking | 10.6% | 22.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 19.5% | 18.3% |
| Obesity | 28.7% | 35.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Summerfield vs Burnham
- In Burnham, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.1% compared to 13.0% in Summerfield.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Burnham at 24.6% versus 22.6% in Summerfield.
- Burnham has a higher smoking rate at 22.4% compared to 10.6% in Summerfield.
- Binge drinking is more common in Summerfield at 19.5% compared to 18.3% in Burnham.
- Burnham has higher obesity rates at 35.5% compared to 28.7% in Summerfield.
- Disability percentages are higher in Summerfield at 12.0% compared to 11.0% in Burnham.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Summerfield | Burnham |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.0% (109) | 0.3% (5) |
| High School Diploma | 8.8% (973) | 27.1% (535) |
| Less than High School | 6.1% (674) | 4.1% (80) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 38.9% (4,326) | 7.5% (147) |
Education Levels Comparison: Summerfield vs Burnham
- A higher percentage of residents in Summerfield have no formal schooling at 1.0% compared to 0.3% in Burnham.
- In Burnham, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 27.1% compared to 8.8% in Summerfield.
- More residents in Summerfield have less than a high school education at 6.1% compared to 4.1% in Burnham.
- A higher percentage of residents in Summerfield hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 38.9% compared to 7.5% in Burnham.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.