Demographics details for Sulphur, OK vs Santa fe springs, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Sulphur, OK vs Santa fe springs, CA.
| Data | Sulphur | Santa fe springs |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 4,951 | 18,439 |
| Median Age | 38.8 years | 38.0 years |
| Median Income | $55,951 | $81,500 |
| Married Families | 34.0% | 37.0% |
| Poverty Level | 14% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 5.5 |
Population Comparison: Sulphur vs Santa fe springs
- The population in Santa fe springs is higher at 18,439, compared to 4,951 in Sulphur.
- Residents in Sulphur have a higher median age of 38.8 years compared to 38.0 years in Santa fe springs.
- Santa fe springs has a higher median income of $81,500, compared to $55,951 in Sulphur.
- In Santa fe springs, the percentage of married families is higher at 37.0%, compared to 34.0% in Sulphur.
- Sulphur has a higher poverty level at 14% compared to 10% in Santa fe springs.
- Santa fe springs has a higher unemployment rate at 5.5% compared to 3.5% in Sulphur.
Demographics
Demographics Sulphur vs Santa fe springs provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Sulphur | Santa fe springs |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 4 |
| White | 60 | -5 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 8 |
| Hispanic | 12 | 75 |
| Two or More Races | 16 | 15 |
| American Indian | 10 | 3 |
Demographics Comparison: Sulphur vs Santa fe springs
- In Santa fe springs, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 4% compared to 2% in Sulphur.
- Sulphur has a higher percentage of White residents at 60% compared to -5% in Santa fe springs.
- In Santa fe springs, the Asian population stands at 8%, greater than 0% in Sulphur.
- Santa fe springs has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 75%, compared to 12% in Sulphur.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Sulphur at 16% compared to 15% in Santa fe springs.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Sulphur at 10% compared to 3% in Santa fe springs.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Sulphur | Santa fe springs |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.2% | 14.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.1% | 11.7% |
| Depression | 25.3% | 15.1% |
| Smoking | 21.4% | 10.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.6% | 15.7% |
| Obesity | 40.7% | 30.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 19.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Sulphur vs Santa fe springs
- More residents in Sulphur report poor mental health at 19.2% compared to 14.9% in Santa fe springs.
- Depression is more prevalent in Sulphur at 25.3% compared to 15.1% in Santa fe springs.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Sulphur at 21.4% compared to 10.0% in Santa fe springs.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Santa fe springs at 15.7% compared to 14.6% in Sulphur.
- Obesity rates are higher in Sulphur at 40.7% compared to 30.9% in Santa fe springs.
- Disability percentages are higher in Sulphur at 19.0% compared to 10.0% in Santa fe springs.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Sulphur | Santa fe springs |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.8% (88) | 3.5% (644) |
| High School Diploma | 18.2% (899) | 16.3% (3,011) |
| Less than High School | 18.1% (898) | 26.5% (4,883) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 10.9% (542) | 15.5% (2,850) |
Education Levels Comparison: Sulphur vs Santa fe springs
- In Santa fe springs, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.5% compared to 1.8% in Sulphur.
- A higher percentage of residents in Sulphur hold a high school diploma at 18.2% compared to 16.3% in Santa fe springs.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Santa fe springs at 26.5%, compared to 18.1% in Sulphur.
- In Santa fe springs, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 15.5% compared to 10.9% in Sulphur.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.