Demographics details for Sulphur, OK vs Mukwonago, WI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Sulphur, OK vs Mukwonago, WI.
Data | Sulphur | Mukwonago |
---|---|---|
Population | 4,951 | 8,446 |
Median Age | 38.8 years | 39.7 years |
Median Income | $55,951 | $91,827 |
Married Families | 34.0% | 44.0% |
Poverty Level | 14% | 5% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.4 |
Population Comparison: Sulphur vs Mukwonago
- The population in Mukwonago is higher at 8,446, compared to 4,951 in Sulphur.
- The median age in Mukwonago is higher at 39.7 years, compared to 38.8 years in Sulphur.
- Mukwonago has a higher median income of $91,827, compared to $55,951 in Sulphur.
- In Mukwonago, the percentage of married families is higher at 44.0%, compared to 34.0% in Sulphur.
- Sulphur has a higher poverty level at 14% compared to 5% in Mukwonago.
- The unemployment rate in Sulphur is higher at 3.5%, compared to 3.4% in Mukwonago.
Demographics
Demographics Sulphur vs Mukwonago provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Sulphur | Mukwonago |
---|---|---|
Black | 2 | Data is updating |
White | 60 | 82 |
Asian | Data is updating | 4 |
Hispanic | 12 | 7 |
Two or More Races | 16 | 7 |
American Indian | 10 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Sulphur vs Mukwonago
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Sulphur at 2% compared to 0% in Mukwonago.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Mukwonago at 82% compared to 60% in Sulphur.
- In Mukwonago, the Asian population stands at 4%, greater than 0% in Sulphur.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Sulphur at 12% compared to 7% in Mukwonago.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Sulphur at 16% compared to 7% in Mukwonago.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Sulphur at 10% compared to 0% in Mukwonago.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Sulphur | Mukwonago |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 19.2% | 13.8% |
Physical Health Not Good | 13.1% | 8.6% |
Depression | 25.3% | 21.2% |
Smoking | 21.4% | 13.8% |
Binge Drinking | 14.6% | 25.2% |
Obesity | 40.7% | 35.3% |
Disability Percentage | 19.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Sulphur vs Mukwonago
- More residents in Sulphur report poor mental health at 19.2% compared to 13.8% in Mukwonago.
- Depression is more prevalent in Sulphur at 25.3% compared to 21.2% in Mukwonago.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Sulphur at 21.4% compared to 13.8% in Mukwonago.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Mukwonago at 25.2% compared to 14.6% in Sulphur.
- Obesity rates are higher in Sulphur at 40.7% compared to 35.3% in Mukwonago.
- Disability percentages are higher in Sulphur at 19.0% compared to 10.0% in Mukwonago.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Sulphur | Mukwonago |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.8% (88) | 0.6% (48) |
High School Diploma | 18.2% (899) | 17.0% (1,435) |
Less than High School | 18.1% (898) | 4.7% (394) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 10.9% (542) | 25.3% (2,138) |
Education Levels Comparison: Sulphur vs Mukwonago
- A higher percentage of residents in Sulphur have no formal schooling at 1.8% compared to 0.6% in Mukwonago.
- A higher percentage of residents in Sulphur hold a high school diploma at 18.2% compared to 17.0% in Mukwonago.
- More residents in Sulphur have less than a high school education at 18.1% compared to 4.7% in Mukwonago.
- In Mukwonago, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 25.3% compared to 10.9% in Sulphur.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.