Demographics details for Sulphur, OK vs Jemison, AL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Sulphur, OK vs Jemison, AL.
| Data | Sulphur | Jemison |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 4,951 | 2,780 |
| Median Age | 38.8 years | 36.0 years |
| Median Income | $55,951 | $62,907 |
| Married Families | 34.0% | 40.0% |
| Poverty Level | 14% | 11% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Sulphur vs Jemison
- In Sulphur, the population is higher at 4,951, compared to 2,780 in Jemison.
- Residents in Sulphur have a higher median age of 38.8 years compared to 36.0 years in Jemison.
- Jemison has a higher median income of $62,907, compared to $55,951 in Sulphur.
- In Jemison, the percentage of married families is higher at 40.0%, compared to 34.0% in Sulphur.
- Sulphur has a higher poverty level at 14% compared to 11% in Jemison.
- Jemison has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 3.5% in Sulphur.
Demographics
Demographics Sulphur vs Jemison provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Sulphur | Jemison |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 22 |
| White | 60 | 71 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
| Hispanic | 12 | 2 |
| Two or More Races | 16 | 4 |
| American Indian | 10 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Sulphur vs Jemison
- In Jemison, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 22% compared to 2% in Sulphur.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Jemison at 71% compared to 60% in Sulphur.
- In Jemison, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Sulphur.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Sulphur at 12% compared to 2% in Jemison.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Sulphur at 16% compared to 4% in Jemison.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Sulphur at 10% compared to 0% in Jemison.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Sulphur | Jemison |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.2% | 20.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.1% | 14.3% |
| Depression | 25.3% | 24.3% |
| Smoking | 21.4% | 23.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.6% | 15.1% |
| Obesity | 40.7% | 43.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 19.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Sulphur vs Jemison
- In Jemison, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.4% compared to 19.2% in Sulphur.
- Depression is more prevalent in Sulphur at 25.3% compared to 24.3% in Jemison.
- Jemison has a higher smoking rate at 23.0% compared to 21.4% in Sulphur.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Jemison at 15.1% compared to 14.6% in Sulphur.
- Jemison has higher obesity rates at 43.8% compared to 40.7% in Sulphur.
- Disability percentages are higher in Sulphur at 19.0% compared to 10.0% in Jemison.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Sulphur | Jemison |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.8% (88) | 0.8% (21) |
| High School Diploma | 18.2% (899) | 20.0% (556) |
| Less than High School | 18.1% (898) | 14.8% (411) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 10.9% (542) | 9.1% (252) |
Education Levels Comparison: Sulphur vs Jemison
- A higher percentage of residents in Sulphur have no formal schooling at 1.8% compared to 0.8% in Jemison.
- In Jemison, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 20.0% compared to 18.2% in Sulphur.
- More residents in Sulphur have less than a high school education at 18.1% compared to 14.8% in Jemison.
- A higher percentage of residents in Sulphur hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 10.9% compared to 9.1% in Jemison.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.