Demographics details for Sulphur, OK vs Hobbs, NM
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Sulphur, OK vs Hobbs, NM.
Data | Sulphur | Hobbs |
---|---|---|
Population | 4,951 | 39,648 |
Median Age | 38.8 years | 30.8 years |
Median Income | $55,951 | $63,804 |
Married Families | 34.0% | 32.0% |
Poverty Level | 14% | 15% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.9 |
Population Comparison: Sulphur vs Hobbs
- The population in Hobbs is higher at 39,648, compared to 4,951 in Sulphur.
- Residents in Sulphur have a higher median age of 38.8 years compared to 30.8 years in Hobbs.
- Hobbs has a higher median income of $63,804, compared to $55,951 in Sulphur.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Sulphur at 34.0% compared to 32.0% in Hobbs.
- The poverty level is higher in Hobbs at 15%, compared to 14% in Sulphur.
- Hobbs has a higher unemployment rate at 4.9% compared to 3.5% in Sulphur.
Demographics
Demographics Sulphur vs Hobbs provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Sulphur | Hobbs |
---|---|---|
Black | 2 | 6 |
White | 60 | 4 |
Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
Hispanic | 12 | 63 |
Two or More Races | 16 | 25 |
American Indian | 10 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Sulphur vs Hobbs
- In Hobbs, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 6% compared to 2% in Sulphur.
- Sulphur has a higher percentage of White residents at 60% compared to 4% in Hobbs.
- In Hobbs, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Sulphur.
- Hobbs has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 63%, compared to 12% in Sulphur.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Hobbs at 25%, compared to 16% in Sulphur.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Sulphur at 10% compared to 1% in Hobbs.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Sulphur | Hobbs |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 19.2% | 17.1% |
Physical Health Not Good | 13.1% | 13.3% |
Depression | 25.3% | 20.6% |
Smoking | 21.4% | 17.7% |
Binge Drinking | 14.6% | 15.4% |
Obesity | 40.7% | 41.7% |
Disability Percentage | 19.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Sulphur vs Hobbs
- More residents in Sulphur report poor mental health at 19.2% compared to 17.1% in Hobbs.
- Depression is more prevalent in Sulphur at 25.3% compared to 20.6% in Hobbs.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Sulphur at 21.4% compared to 17.7% in Hobbs.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Hobbs at 15.4% compared to 14.6% in Sulphur.
- Hobbs has higher obesity rates at 41.7% compared to 40.7% in Sulphur.
- Disability percentages are higher in Sulphur at 19.0% compared to 11.0% in Hobbs.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Sulphur | Hobbs |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.8% (88) | 2.2% (856) |
High School Diploma | 18.2% (899) | 15.9% (6,312) |
Less than High School | 18.1% (898) | 26.2% (10,381) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 10.9% (542) | 9.2% (3,667) |
Education Levels Comparison: Sulphur vs Hobbs
- In Hobbs, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.2% compared to 1.8% in Sulphur.
- A higher percentage of residents in Sulphur hold a high school diploma at 18.2% compared to 15.9% in Hobbs.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Hobbs at 26.2%, compared to 18.1% in Sulphur.
- A higher percentage of residents in Sulphur hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 10.9% compared to 9.2% in Hobbs.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.