Demographics details for Sulphur, OK vs Gladewater, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Sulphur, OK vs Gladewater, TX.
| Data | Sulphur | Gladewater |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 4,951 | 6,230 |
| Median Age | 38.8 years | 33.3 years |
| Median Income | $55,951 | $47,749 |
| Married Families | 34.0% | 26.0% |
| Poverty Level | 14% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Sulphur vs Gladewater
- The population in Gladewater is higher at 6,230, compared to 4,951 in Sulphur.
- Residents in Sulphur have a higher median age of 38.8 years compared to 33.3 years in Gladewater.
- Sulphur has a higher median income of $55,951 compared to $47,749 in Gladewater.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Sulphur at 34.0% compared to 26.0% in Gladewater.
- Sulphur has a higher poverty level at 14% compared to 10% in Gladewater.
- The unemployment rate in Sulphur is higher at 3.5%, compared to 3.2% in Gladewater.
Demographics
Demographics Sulphur vs Gladewater provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Sulphur | Gladewater |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 17 |
| White | 60 | 61 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
| Hispanic | 12 | 15 |
| Two or More Races | 16 | 6 |
| American Indian | 10 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Sulphur vs Gladewater
- In Gladewater, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 17% compared to 2% in Sulphur.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Gladewater at 61% compared to 60% in Sulphur.
- In Gladewater, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Sulphur.
- Gladewater has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 15%, compared to 12% in Sulphur.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Sulphur at 16% compared to 6% in Gladewater.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Sulphur at 10% compared to 0% in Gladewater.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Sulphur | Gladewater |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.2% | 19.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.1% | 13.2% |
| Depression | 25.3% | 25.8% |
| Smoking | 21.4% | 20.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.6% | 17.5% |
| Obesity | 40.7% | 38.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 19.0% | 18.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Sulphur vs Gladewater
- In Gladewater, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.6% compared to 19.2% in Sulphur.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Gladewater at 25.8% versus 25.3% in Sulphur.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Sulphur at 21.4% compared to 20.9% in Gladewater.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Gladewater at 17.5% compared to 14.6% in Sulphur.
- Obesity rates are higher in Sulphur at 40.7% compared to 38.5% in Gladewater.
- Disability percentages are higher in Sulphur at 19.0% compared to 18.0% in Gladewater.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Sulphur | Gladewater |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.8% (88) | 0.5% (30) |
| High School Diploma | 18.2% (899) | 18.2% (1,135) |
| Less than High School | 18.1% (898) | 24.6% (1,532) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 10.9% (542) | 7.6% (474) |
Education Levels Comparison: Sulphur vs Gladewater
- A higher percentage of residents in Sulphur have no formal schooling at 1.8% compared to 0.5% in Gladewater.
- Both cities have the same percentage of residents with high school diplomas at 18.2%.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Gladewater at 24.6%, compared to 18.1% in Sulphur.
- A higher percentage of residents in Sulphur hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 10.9% compared to 7.6% in Gladewater.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.