Demographics details for Sulphur, OK vs Covington, TN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Sulphur, OK vs Covington, TN.
Data | Sulphur | Covington |
---|---|---|
Population | 4,951 | 8,597 |
Median Age | 38.8 years | 35.4 years |
Median Income | $55,951 | $44,384 |
Married Families | 34.0% | 31.0% |
Poverty Level | 14% | 14% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 5.2 |
Population Comparison: Sulphur vs Covington
- The population in Covington is higher at 8,597, compared to 4,951 in Sulphur.
- Residents in Sulphur have a higher median age of 38.8 years compared to 35.4 years in Covington.
- Sulphur has a higher median income of $55,951 compared to $44,384 in Covington.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Sulphur at 34.0% compared to 31.0% in Covington.
- The poverty level is identical in both Sulphur and Covington at 14%.
- Covington has a higher unemployment rate at 5.2% compared to 3.5% in Sulphur.
Demographics
Demographics Sulphur vs Covington provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Sulphur | Covington |
---|---|---|
Black | 2 | 55 |
White | 60 | 41 |
Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 12 | 2 |
Two or More Races | 16 | 2 |
American Indian | 10 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Sulphur vs Covington
- In Covington, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 55% compared to 2% in Sulphur.
- Sulphur has a higher percentage of White residents at 60% compared to 41% in Covington.
- Both Sulphur and Covington have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Sulphur at 12% compared to 2% in Covington.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Sulphur at 16% compared to 2% in Covington.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Sulphur at 10% compared to 0% in Covington.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Sulphur | Covington |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 19.2% | 22.2% |
Physical Health Not Good | 13.1% | 16.3% |
Depression | 25.3% | 28.8% |
Smoking | 21.4% | 26.8% |
Binge Drinking | 14.6% | 12.9% |
Obesity | 40.7% | 48.0% |
Disability Percentage | 19.0% | 18.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Sulphur vs Covington
- In Covington, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 22.2% compared to 19.2% in Sulphur.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Covington at 28.8% versus 25.3% in Sulphur.
- Covington has a higher smoking rate at 26.8% compared to 21.4% in Sulphur.
- Binge drinking is more common in Sulphur at 14.6% compared to 12.9% in Covington.
- Covington has higher obesity rates at 48.0% compared to 40.7% in Sulphur.
- Disability percentages are higher in Sulphur at 19.0% compared to 18.0% in Covington.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Sulphur | Covington |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.8% (88) | 1.8% (155) |
High School Diploma | 18.2% (899) | 21.2% (1,822) |
Less than High School | 18.1% (898) | 14.8% (1,273) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 10.9% (542) | 8.5% (734) |
Education Levels Comparison: Sulphur vs Covington
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Sulphur and Covington at 1.8%.
- In Covington, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 21.2% compared to 18.2% in Sulphur.
- More residents in Sulphur have less than a high school education at 18.1% compared to 14.8% in Covington.
- A higher percentage of residents in Sulphur hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 10.9% compared to 8.5% in Covington.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.