Demographics details for Sulphur, OK vs Cochranville, PA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Sulphur, OK vs Cochranville, PA.
| Data | Sulphur | Cochranville |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 4,951 | 488 |
| Median Age | 38.8 years | 49.6 years |
| Median Income | $55,951 | $92,292 |
| Married Families | 34.0% | 50.0% |
| Poverty Level | 14% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.0 |
Population Comparison: Sulphur vs Cochranville
- In Sulphur, the population is higher at 4,951, compared to 488 in Cochranville.
- The median age in Cochranville is higher at 49.6 years, compared to 38.8 years in Sulphur.
- Cochranville has a higher median income of $92,292, compared to $55,951 in Sulphur.
- In Cochranville, the percentage of married families is higher at 50.0%, compared to 34.0% in Sulphur.
- Sulphur has a higher poverty level at 14% compared to 5% in Cochranville.
- Cochranville has a higher unemployment rate at 4.0% compared to 3.5% in Sulphur.
Demographics
Demographics Sulphur vs Cochranville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Sulphur | Cochranville |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | Data is updating |
| White | 60 | 90 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 12 | 6 |
| Two or More Races | 16 | 4 |
| American Indian | 10 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Sulphur vs Cochranville
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Sulphur at 2% compared to 0% in Cochranville.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Cochranville at 90% compared to 60% in Sulphur.
- Both Sulphur and Cochranville have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Sulphur at 12% compared to 6% in Cochranville.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Sulphur at 16% compared to 4% in Cochranville.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Sulphur at 10% compared to 0% in Cochranville.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Sulphur | Cochranville |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.2% | 17.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.1% | 12.3% |
| Depression | 25.3% | 24.1% |
| Smoking | 21.4% | 19.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.6% | 17.5% |
| Obesity | 40.7% | 35.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 19.0% | 8.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Sulphur vs Cochranville
- More residents in Sulphur report poor mental health at 19.2% compared to 17.1% in Cochranville.
- Depression is more prevalent in Sulphur at 25.3% compared to 24.1% in Cochranville.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Sulphur at 21.4% compared to 19.8% in Cochranville.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Cochranville at 17.5% compared to 14.6% in Sulphur.
- Obesity rates are higher in Sulphur at 40.7% compared to 35.6% in Cochranville.
- Disability percentages are higher in Sulphur at 19.0% compared to 8.0% in Cochranville.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Sulphur | Cochranville |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.8% (88) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 18.2% (899) | 24.4% (119) |
| Less than High School | 18.1% (898) | 15.6% (76) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 10.9% (542) | 13.7% (67) |
Education Levels Comparison: Sulphur vs Cochranville
- A higher percentage of residents in Sulphur have no formal schooling at 1.8% compared to 0.0% in Cochranville.
- In Cochranville, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 24.4% compared to 18.2% in Sulphur.
- More residents in Sulphur have less than a high school education at 18.1% compared to 15.6% in Cochranville.
- In Cochranville, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 13.7% compared to 10.9% in Sulphur.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.