Demographics details for Sulphur, LA vs West richland, WA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Sulphur, LA vs West richland, WA.
| Data | Sulphur | West richland |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 20,342 | 17,795 |
| Median Age | 38.9 years | 35.3 years |
| Median Income | $53,606 | $118,093 |
| Married Families | 36.0% | 40.0% |
| Poverty Level | 15% | 7% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 4.0 |
Population Comparison: Sulphur vs West richland
- In Sulphur, the population is higher at 20,342, compared to 17,795 in West richland.
- Residents in Sulphur have a higher median age of 38.9 years compared to 35.3 years in West richland.
- West richland has a higher median income of $118,093, compared to $53,606 in Sulphur.
- In West richland, the percentage of married families is higher at 40.0%, compared to 36.0% in Sulphur.
- Sulphur has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 7% in West richland.
- The unemployment rate in Sulphur is higher at 4.2%, compared to 4.0% in West richland.
Demographics
Demographics Sulphur vs West richland provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Sulphur | West richland |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 9 | 1 |
| White | 83 | 70 |
| Asian | 1 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 5 | 14 |
| Two or More Races | 2 | 14 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Sulphur vs West richland
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Sulphur at 9% compared to 1% in West richland.
- Sulphur has a higher percentage of White residents at 83% compared to 70% in West richland.
- Both Sulphur and West richland have the same percentage of Asian residents at 1%.
- West richland has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 14%, compared to 5% in Sulphur.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in West richland at 14%, compared to 2% in Sulphur.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Sulphur and West richland at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Sulphur | West richland |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.6% | 15.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.4% | 9.6% |
| Depression | 28.7% | 25.4% |
| Smoking | 21.3% | 11.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 20.6% | 19.1% |
| Obesity | 37.3% | 30.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Sulphur vs West richland
- More residents in Sulphur report poor mental health at 19.6% compared to 15.5% in West richland.
- Depression is more prevalent in Sulphur at 28.7% compared to 25.4% in West richland.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Sulphur at 21.3% compared to 11.5% in West richland.
- Binge drinking is more common in Sulphur at 20.6% compared to 19.1% in West richland.
- Obesity rates are higher in Sulphur at 37.3% compared to 30.2% in West richland.
- Disability percentages are higher in Sulphur at 16.0% compared to 10.0% in West richland.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Sulphur | West richland |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.5% (93) | 0.2% (28) |
| High School Diploma | 24.2% (4,925) | 8.9% (1,580) |
| Less than High School | 19.3% (3,918) | 7.2% (1,287) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.7% (2,384) | 22.5% (4,000) |
Education Levels Comparison: Sulphur vs West richland
- A higher percentage of residents in Sulphur have no formal schooling at 0.5% compared to 0.2% in West richland.
- A higher percentage of residents in Sulphur hold a high school diploma at 24.2% compared to 8.9% in West richland.
- More residents in Sulphur have less than a high school education at 19.3% compared to 7.2% in West richland.
- In West richland, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 22.5% compared to 11.7% in Sulphur.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.