Demographics details for Sulphur, LA vs Tullahoma, TN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Sulphur, LA vs Tullahoma, TN.
| Data | Sulphur | Tullahoma |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 20,342 | 20,830 |
| Median Age | 38.9 years | 40.2 years |
| Median Income | $53,606 | $56,771 |
| Married Families | 36.0% | 41.0% |
| Poverty Level | 15% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Sulphur vs Tullahoma
- The population in Tullahoma is higher at 20,830, compared to 20,342 in Sulphur.
- The median age in Tullahoma is higher at 40.2 years, compared to 38.9 years in Sulphur.
- Tullahoma has a higher median income of $56,771, compared to $53,606 in Sulphur.
- In Tullahoma, the percentage of married families is higher at 41.0%, compared to 36.0% in Sulphur.
- Sulphur has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 10% in Tullahoma.
- The unemployment rate in Sulphur is higher at 4.2%, compared to 3.5% in Tullahoma.
Demographics
Demographics Sulphur vs Tullahoma provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Sulphur | Tullahoma |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 9 | 6 |
| White | 83 | 83 |
| Asian | 1 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 5 | 5 |
| Two or More Races | 2 | 4 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Sulphur vs Tullahoma
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Sulphur at 9% compared to 6% in Tullahoma.
- The percentage of White residents is the same in both Sulphur and Tullahoma at 83%.
- In Tullahoma, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 1% in Sulphur.
- The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Sulphur and Tullahoma at 5%.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Tullahoma at 4%, compared to 2% in Sulphur.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Sulphur and Tullahoma at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Sulphur | Tullahoma |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.6% | 19.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.4% | 14.0% |
| Depression | 28.7% | 28.9% |
| Smoking | 21.3% | 22.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 20.6% | 15.1% |
| Obesity | 37.3% | 39.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 19.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Sulphur vs Tullahoma
- In Tullahoma, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.9% compared to 19.6% in Sulphur.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Tullahoma at 28.9% versus 28.7% in Sulphur.
- Tullahoma has a higher smoking rate at 22.6% compared to 21.3% in Sulphur.
- Binge drinking is more common in Sulphur at 20.6% compared to 15.1% in Tullahoma.
- Tullahoma has higher obesity rates at 39.1% compared to 37.3% in Sulphur.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Tullahoma at 19.0% compared to 16.0% in Sulphur.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Sulphur | Tullahoma |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.5% (93) | 0.6% (117) |
| High School Diploma | 24.2% (4,925) | 18.9% (3,932) |
| Less than High School | 19.3% (3,918) | 14.1% (2,944) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.7% (2,384) | 19.3% (4,012) |
Education Levels Comparison: Sulphur vs Tullahoma
- In Tullahoma, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.5% in Sulphur.
- A higher percentage of residents in Sulphur hold a high school diploma at 24.2% compared to 18.9% in Tullahoma.
- More residents in Sulphur have less than a high school education at 19.3% compared to 14.1% in Tullahoma.
- In Tullahoma, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.3% compared to 11.7% in Sulphur.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.