Demographics details for Sulphur, LA vs Shirley, NY
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Sulphur, LA vs Shirley, NY.
| Data | Sulphur | Shirley |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 20,342 | 26,498 |
| Median Age | 38.9 years | 40.4 years |
| Median Income | $53,606 | $109,821 |
| Married Families | 36.0% | 37.0% |
| Poverty Level | 15% | 6% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Sulphur vs Shirley
- The population in Shirley is higher at 26,498, compared to 20,342 in Sulphur.
- The median age in Shirley is higher at 40.4 years, compared to 38.9 years in Sulphur.
- Shirley has a higher median income of $109,821, compared to $53,606 in Sulphur.
- In Shirley, the percentage of married families is higher at 37.0%, compared to 36.0% in Sulphur.
- Sulphur has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 6% in Shirley.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Sulphur and Shirley at 4.2%.
Demographics
Demographics Sulphur vs Shirley provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Sulphur | Shirley |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 9 | 8 |
| White | 83 | 56 |
| Asian | 1 | 5 |
| Hispanic | 5 | 23 |
| Two or More Races | 2 | 8 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Sulphur vs Shirley
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Sulphur at 9% compared to 8% in Shirley.
- Sulphur has a higher percentage of White residents at 83% compared to 56% in Shirley.
- In Shirley, the Asian population stands at 5%, greater than 1% in Sulphur.
- Shirley has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 23%, compared to 5% in Sulphur.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Shirley at 8%, compared to 2% in Sulphur.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Sulphur and Shirley at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Sulphur | Shirley |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.6% | 16.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.4% | 10.7% |
| Depression | 28.7% | 21.1% |
| Smoking | 21.3% | 17.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 20.6% | 16.0% |
| Obesity | 37.3% | 32.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Sulphur vs Shirley
- More residents in Sulphur report poor mental health at 19.6% compared to 16.3% in Shirley.
- Depression is more prevalent in Sulphur at 28.7% compared to 21.1% in Shirley.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Sulphur at 21.3% compared to 17.0% in Shirley.
- Binge drinking is more common in Sulphur at 20.6% compared to 16.0% in Shirley.
- Obesity rates are higher in Sulphur at 37.3% compared to 32.0% in Shirley.
- Disability percentages are higher in Sulphur at 16.0% compared to 10.0% in Shirley.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Sulphur | Shirley |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.5% (93) | 2.1% (555) |
| High School Diploma | 24.2% (4,925) | 22.2% (5,874) |
| Less than High School | 19.3% (3,918) | 13.4% (3,542) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.7% (2,384) | 13.4% (3,547) |
Education Levels Comparison: Sulphur vs Shirley
- In Shirley, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.1% compared to 0.5% in Sulphur.
- A higher percentage of residents in Sulphur hold a high school diploma at 24.2% compared to 22.2% in Shirley.
- More residents in Sulphur have less than a high school education at 19.3% compared to 13.4% in Shirley.
- In Shirley, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 13.4% compared to 11.7% in Sulphur.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.