Demographics details for Sulphur, LA vs Provo, UT
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Sulphur, LA vs Provo, UT.
| Data | Sulphur | Provo |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 20,342 | 113,523 |
| Median Age | 38.9 years | 23.6 years |
| Median Income | $53,606 | $57,943 |
| Married Families | 36.0% | 36.0% |
| Poverty Level | 15% | 11% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 4.0 |
Population Comparison: Sulphur vs Provo
- The population in Provo is higher at 113,523, compared to 20,342 in Sulphur.
- Residents in Sulphur have a higher median age of 38.9 years compared to 23.6 years in Provo.
- Provo has a higher median income of $57,943, compared to $53,606 in Sulphur.
- The percentage of married families is the same in both Sulphur and Provo at 36.0%.
- Sulphur has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 11% in Provo.
- The unemployment rate in Sulphur is higher at 4.2%, compared to 4.0% in Provo.
Demographics
Demographics Sulphur vs Provo provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Sulphur | Provo |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 9 | 1 |
| White | 83 | 69 |
| Asian | 1 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 5 | 18 |
| Two or More Races | 2 | 9 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Sulphur vs Provo
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Sulphur at 9% compared to 1% in Provo.
- Sulphur has a higher percentage of White residents at 83% compared to 69% in Provo.
- In Provo, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 1% in Sulphur.
- Provo has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 18%, compared to 5% in Sulphur.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Provo at 9%, compared to 2% in Sulphur.
- In Provo, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Sulphur.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Sulphur | Provo |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.6% | 16.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.4% | 12.0% |
| Depression | 28.7% | 24.5% |
| Smoking | 21.3% | 8.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 20.6% | 7.3% |
| Obesity | 37.3% | 33.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Sulphur vs Provo
- More residents in Sulphur report poor mental health at 19.6% compared to 16.3% in Provo.
- Depression is more prevalent in Sulphur at 28.7% compared to 24.5% in Provo.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Sulphur at 21.3% compared to 8.4% in Provo.
- Binge drinking is more common in Sulphur at 20.6% compared to 7.3% in Provo.
- Obesity rates are higher in Sulphur at 37.3% compared to 33.5% in Provo.
- Disability percentages are higher in Sulphur at 16.0% compared to 10.0% in Provo.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Sulphur | Provo |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.5% (93) | 0.6% (663) |
| High School Diploma | 24.2% (4,925) | 4.6% (5,209) |
| Less than High School | 19.3% (3,918) | 5.7% (6,435) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.7% (2,384) | 18.3% (20,752) |
Education Levels Comparison: Sulphur vs Provo
- In Provo, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.5% in Sulphur.
- A higher percentage of residents in Sulphur hold a high school diploma at 24.2% compared to 4.6% in Provo.
- More residents in Sulphur have less than a high school education at 19.3% compared to 5.7% in Provo.
- In Provo, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.3% compared to 11.7% in Sulphur.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.