Demographics details for Sulphur, LA vs New cambria, KS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Sulphur, LA vs New cambria, KS.
| Data | Sulphur | New cambria |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 20,342 | 104 |
| Median Age | 38.9 years | 30.7 years |
| Median Income | $53,606 | $83,601 |
| Married Families | 36.0% | 32.0% |
| Poverty Level | 15% | 9% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Sulphur vs New cambria
- In Sulphur, the population is higher at 20,342, compared to 104 in New cambria.
- Residents in Sulphur have a higher median age of 38.9 years compared to 30.7 years in New cambria.
- New cambria has a higher median income of $83,601, compared to $53,606 in Sulphur.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Sulphur at 36.0% compared to 32.0% in New cambria.
- Sulphur has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 9% in New cambria.
- The unemployment rate in Sulphur is higher at 4.2%, compared to 3.2% in New cambria.
Demographics
Demographics Sulphur vs New cambria provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Sulphur | New cambria |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 9 | Data is updating |
| White | 83 | 96 |
| Asian | 1 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 5 | 1 |
| Two or More Races | 2 | 1 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Sulphur vs New cambria
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Sulphur at 9% compared to 0% in New cambria.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in New cambria at 96% compared to 83% in Sulphur.
- In New cambria, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 1% in Sulphur.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Sulphur at 5% compared to 1% in New cambria.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Sulphur at 2% compared to 1% in New cambria.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Sulphur and New cambria at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Sulphur | New cambria |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.6% | 14.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.4% | 9.2% |
| Depression | 28.7% | 20.8% |
| Smoking | 21.3% | 16.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 20.6% | 20.0% |
| Obesity | 37.3% | 33.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Sulphur vs New cambria
- More residents in Sulphur report poor mental health at 19.6% compared to 14.3% in New cambria.
- Depression is more prevalent in Sulphur at 28.7% compared to 20.8% in New cambria.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Sulphur at 21.3% compared to 16.5% in New cambria.
- Binge drinking is more common in Sulphur at 20.6% compared to 20.0% in New cambria.
- Obesity rates are higher in Sulphur at 37.3% compared to 33.7% in New cambria.
- Disability percentages are higher in Sulphur at 16.0% compared to 12.0% in New cambria.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Sulphur | New cambria |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.5% (93) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 24.2% (4,925) | 18.3% (19) |
| Less than High School | 19.3% (3,918) | 3.8% (4) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.7% (2,384) | 8.7% (9) |
Education Levels Comparison: Sulphur vs New cambria
- A higher percentage of residents in Sulphur have no formal schooling at 0.5% compared to 0.0% in New cambria.
- A higher percentage of residents in Sulphur hold a high school diploma at 24.2% compared to 18.3% in New cambria.
- More residents in Sulphur have less than a high school education at 19.3% compared to 3.8% in New cambria.
- A higher percentage of residents in Sulphur hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 11.7% compared to 8.7% in New cambria.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.