Demographics details for Sulphur, LA vs Menomonee falls, WI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Sulphur, LA vs Menomonee falls, WI.
Data | Sulphur | Menomonee falls |
---|---|---|
Population | 20,342 | 39,246 |
Median Age | 38.9 years | 41.9 years |
Median Income | $53,606 | $96,986 |
Married Families | 36.0% | 46.0% |
Poverty Level | 15% | 5% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 2.8 |
Population Comparison: Sulphur vs Menomonee falls
- The population in Menomonee falls is higher at 39,246, compared to 20,342 in Sulphur.
- The median age in Menomonee falls is higher at 41.9 years, compared to 38.9 years in Sulphur.
- Menomonee falls has a higher median income of $96,986, compared to $53,606 in Sulphur.
- In Menomonee falls, the percentage of married families is higher at 46.0%, compared to 36.0% in Sulphur.
- Sulphur has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 5% in Menomonee falls.
- The unemployment rate in Sulphur is higher at 4.2%, compared to 2.8% in Menomonee falls.
Demographics
Demographics Sulphur vs Menomonee falls provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Sulphur | Menomonee falls |
---|---|---|
Black | 9 | 4 |
White | 83 | 82 |
Asian | 1 | 5 |
Hispanic | 5 | 5 |
Two or More Races | 2 | 4 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Sulphur vs Menomonee falls
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Sulphur at 9% compared to 4% in Menomonee falls.
- Sulphur has a higher percentage of White residents at 83% compared to 82% in Menomonee falls.
- In Menomonee falls, the Asian population stands at 5%, greater than 1% in Sulphur.
- The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Sulphur and Menomonee falls at 5%.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Menomonee falls at 4%, compared to 2% in Sulphur.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Sulphur and Menomonee falls at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Sulphur | Menomonee falls |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 19.6% | 12.7% |
Physical Health Not Good | 12.4% | 7.7% |
Depression | 28.7% | 20.0% |
Smoking | 21.3% | 11.6% |
Binge Drinking | 20.6% | 25.0% |
Obesity | 37.3% | 33.4% |
Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Sulphur vs Menomonee falls
- More residents in Sulphur report poor mental health at 19.6% compared to 12.7% in Menomonee falls.
- Depression is more prevalent in Sulphur at 28.7% compared to 20.0% in Menomonee falls.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Sulphur at 21.3% compared to 11.6% in Menomonee falls.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Menomonee falls at 25.0% compared to 20.6% in Sulphur.
- Obesity rates are higher in Sulphur at 37.3% compared to 33.4% in Menomonee falls.
- Disability percentages are higher in Sulphur at 16.0% compared to 10.0% in Menomonee falls.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Sulphur | Menomonee falls |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.5% (93) | 0.3% (117) |
High School Diploma | 24.2% (4,925) | 14.9% (5,834) |
Less than High School | 19.3% (3,918) | 4.9% (1,936) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.7% (2,384) | 33.4% (13,122) |
Education Levels Comparison: Sulphur vs Menomonee falls
- A higher percentage of residents in Sulphur have no formal schooling at 0.5% compared to 0.3% in Menomonee falls.
- A higher percentage of residents in Sulphur hold a high school diploma at 24.2% compared to 14.9% in Menomonee falls.
- More residents in Sulphur have less than a high school education at 19.3% compared to 4.9% in Menomonee falls.
- In Menomonee falls, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 33.4% compared to 11.7% in Sulphur.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.