Demographics details for Sulphur, LA vs Marshall, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Sulphur, LA vs Marshall, CA.
| Data | Sulphur | Marshall |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 20,342 | 533 |
| Median Age | 38.9 years | 42.0 years |
| Median Income | $53,606 | $90,000 |
| Married Families | 36.0% | 60.0% |
| Poverty Level | 15% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 3.0 |
Population Comparison: Sulphur vs Marshall
- In Sulphur, the population is higher at 20,342, compared to 533 in Marshall.
- The median age in Marshall is higher at 42.0 years, compared to 38.9 years in Sulphur.
- Marshall has a higher median income of $90,000, compared to $53,606 in Sulphur.
- In Marshall, the percentage of married families is higher at 60.0%, compared to 36.0% in Sulphur.
- Sulphur has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 5% in Marshall.
- The unemployment rate in Sulphur is higher at 4.2%, compared to 3.0% in Marshall.
Demographics
Demographics Sulphur vs Marshall provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Sulphur | Marshall |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 9 | Data is updating |
| White | 83 | 90 |
| Asian | 1 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 5 | 5 |
| Two or More Races | 2 | 3 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Sulphur vs Marshall
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Sulphur at 9% compared to 0% in Marshall.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Marshall at 90% compared to 83% in Sulphur.
- In Marshall, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 1% in Sulphur.
- The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Sulphur and Marshall at 5%.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Marshall at 3%, compared to 2% in Sulphur.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Sulphur and Marshall at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Sulphur | Marshall |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.6% | Data is updating% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.4% | Data is updating% |
| Depression | 28.7% | Data is updating% |
| Smoking | 21.3% | Data is updating% |
| Binge Drinking | 20.6% | Data is updating% |
| Obesity | 37.3% | Data is updating% |
| Disability Percentage | 16.0% | Data is updating% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Sulphur vs Marshall
- More residents in Sulphur report poor mental health at 19.6% compared to 0.0% in Marshall.
- Depression is more prevalent in Sulphur at 28.7% compared to 0.0% in Marshall.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Sulphur at 21.3% compared to 0.0% in Marshall.
- Binge drinking is more common in Sulphur at 20.6% compared to 0.0% in Marshall.
- Obesity rates are higher in Sulphur at 37.3% compared to 0.0% in Marshall.
- Disability percentages are higher in Sulphur at 16.0% compared to 0.0% in Marshall.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Sulphur | Marshall |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.5% (93) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 24.2% (4,925) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| Less than High School | 19.3% (3,918) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.7% (2,384) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Education Levels Comparison: Sulphur vs Marshall
- A higher percentage of residents in Sulphur have no formal schooling at 0.5% compared to 0.0% in Marshall.
- A higher percentage of residents in Sulphur hold a high school diploma at 24.2% compared to 0.0% in Marshall.
- More residents in Sulphur have less than a high school education at 19.3% compared to 0.0% in Marshall.
- A higher percentage of residents in Sulphur hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 11.7% compared to 0.0% in Marshall.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.