Demographics details for Sulphur, LA vs Hackensack, NJ
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Sulphur, LA vs Hackensack, NJ.
| Data | Sulphur | Hackensack |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 20,342 | 45,633 |
| Median Age | 38.9 years | 40.0 years |
| Median Income | $53,606 | $79,133 |
| Married Families | 36.0% | 33.0% |
| Poverty Level | 15% | 9% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 5.0 |
Population Comparison: Sulphur vs Hackensack
- The population in Hackensack is higher at 45,633, compared to 20,342 in Sulphur.
- The median age in Hackensack is higher at 40.0 years, compared to 38.9 years in Sulphur.
- Hackensack has a higher median income of $79,133, compared to $53,606 in Sulphur.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Sulphur at 36.0% compared to 33.0% in Hackensack.
- Sulphur has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 9% in Hackensack.
- Hackensack has a higher unemployment rate at 5.0% compared to 4.2% in Sulphur.
Demographics
Demographics Sulphur vs Hackensack provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Sulphur | Hackensack |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 9 | 20 |
| White | 83 | 17 |
| Asian | 1 | 13 |
| Hispanic | 5 | 37 |
| Two or More Races | 2 | 13 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Sulphur vs Hackensack
- In Hackensack, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 20% compared to 9% in Sulphur.
- Sulphur has a higher percentage of White residents at 83% compared to 17% in Hackensack.
- In Hackensack, the Asian population stands at 13%, greater than 1% in Sulphur.
- Hackensack has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 37%, compared to 5% in Sulphur.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Hackensack at 13%, compared to 2% in Sulphur.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Sulphur and Hackensack at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Sulphur | Hackensack |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.6% | 14.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.4% | 9.9% |
| Depression | 28.7% | 15.7% |
| Smoking | 21.3% | 13.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 20.6% | 15.5% |
| Obesity | 37.3% | 30.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Sulphur vs Hackensack
- More residents in Sulphur report poor mental health at 19.6% compared to 14.2% in Hackensack.
- Depression is more prevalent in Sulphur at 28.7% compared to 15.7% in Hackensack.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Sulphur at 21.3% compared to 13.5% in Hackensack.
- Binge drinking is more common in Sulphur at 20.6% compared to 15.5% in Hackensack.
- Obesity rates are higher in Sulphur at 37.3% compared to 30.5% in Hackensack.
- Disability percentages are higher in Sulphur at 16.0% compared to 11.0% in Hackensack.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Sulphur | Hackensack |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.5% (93) | 3.3% (1,520) |
| High School Diploma | 24.2% (4,925) | 17.2% (7,861) |
| Less than High School | 19.3% (3,918) | 19.0% (8,680) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.7% (2,384) | 31.8% (14,527) |
Education Levels Comparison: Sulphur vs Hackensack
- In Hackensack, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.3% compared to 0.5% in Sulphur.
- A higher percentage of residents in Sulphur hold a high school diploma at 24.2% compared to 17.2% in Hackensack.
- More residents in Sulphur have less than a high school education at 19.3% compared to 19.0% in Hackensack.
- In Hackensack, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 31.8% compared to 11.7% in Sulphur.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.