Demographics details for Sulphur, LA vs Fort leonard wood, MO
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Sulphur, LA vs Fort leonard wood, MO.
| Data | Sulphur | Fort leonard wood |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 20,342 | 15,615 |
| Median Age | 38.9 years | 20.6 years |
| Median Income | $53,606 | $64,890 |
| Married Families | 36.0% | 25.0% |
| Poverty Level | 15% | Data is updating |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 3.1 |
Population Comparison: Sulphur vs Fort leonard wood
- In Sulphur, the population is higher at 20,342, compared to 15,615 in Fort leonard wood.
- Residents in Sulphur have a higher median age of 38.9 years compared to 20.6 years in Fort leonard wood.
- Fort leonard wood has a higher median income of $64,890, compared to $53,606 in Sulphur.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Sulphur at 36.0% compared to 25.0% in Fort leonard wood.
- Sulphur has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 0% in Fort leonard wood.
- The unemployment rate in Sulphur is higher at 4.2%, compared to 3.1% in Fort leonard wood.
Demographics
Demographics Sulphur vs Fort leonard wood provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Sulphur | Fort leonard wood |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 9 | 18 |
| White | 83 | 35 |
| Asian | 1 | 4 |
| Hispanic | 5 | 24 |
| Two or More Races | 2 | 18 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Sulphur vs Fort leonard wood
- In Fort leonard wood, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 18% compared to 9% in Sulphur.
- Sulphur has a higher percentage of White residents at 83% compared to 35% in Fort leonard wood.
- In Fort leonard wood, the Asian population stands at 4%, greater than 1% in Sulphur.
- Fort leonard wood has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 24%, compared to 5% in Sulphur.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Fort leonard wood at 18%, compared to 2% in Sulphur.
- In Fort leonard wood, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Sulphur.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Sulphur | Fort leonard wood |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.6% | 21.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.4% | 6.6% |
| Depression | 28.7% | 24.0% |
| Smoking | 21.3% | 12.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 20.6% | 25.4% |
| Obesity | 37.3% | 30.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 2.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Sulphur vs Fort leonard wood
- In Fort leonard wood, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 21.1% compared to 19.6% in Sulphur.
- Depression is more prevalent in Sulphur at 28.7% compared to 24.0% in Fort leonard wood.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Sulphur at 21.3% compared to 12.8% in Fort leonard wood.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Fort leonard wood at 25.4% compared to 20.6% in Sulphur.
- Obesity rates are higher in Sulphur at 37.3% compared to 30.7% in Fort leonard wood.
- Disability percentages are higher in Sulphur at 16.0% compared to 2.0% in Fort leonard wood.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Sulphur | Fort leonard wood |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.5% (93) | 0.2% (38) |
| High School Diploma | 24.2% (4,925) | 4.5% (700) |
| Less than High School | 19.3% (3,918) | 0.8% (119) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.7% (2,384) | 9.3% (1,457) |
Education Levels Comparison: Sulphur vs Fort leonard wood
- A higher percentage of residents in Sulphur have no formal schooling at 0.5% compared to 0.2% in Fort leonard wood.
- A higher percentage of residents in Sulphur hold a high school diploma at 24.2% compared to 4.5% in Fort leonard wood.
- More residents in Sulphur have less than a high school education at 19.3% compared to 0.8% in Fort leonard wood.
- A higher percentage of residents in Sulphur hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 11.7% compared to 9.3% in Fort leonard wood.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.