Demographics details for Sulphur springs, TX vs Frankfort, MI

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Sulphur springs, TX vs Frankfort, MI.

Data Sulphur springs Frankfort
Population 16,408 1,272
Median Age 39.4 years 61.1 years
Median Income $54,950 $49,219
Married Families 39.0% 36.0%
Poverty Level 15% 10%
Unemployment Rate 4.5 3.5

Population Comparison: Sulphur springs vs Frankfort

  • In Sulphur springs, the population is higher at 16,408, compared to 1,272 in Frankfort.
  • The median age in Frankfort is higher at 61.1 years, compared to 39.4 years in Sulphur springs.
  • Sulphur springs has a higher median income of $54,950 compared to $49,219 in Frankfort.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Sulphur springs at 39.0% compared to 36.0% in Frankfort.
  • Sulphur springs has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 10% in Frankfort.
  • The unemployment rate in Sulphur springs is higher at 4.5%, compared to 3.5% in Frankfort.

Demographics

Demographics Sulphur springs vs Frankfort provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Sulphur springs Frankfort
Black 14 4
White 63 93
Asian 1 Data is updating
Hispanic 17 Data is updating
Two or More Races 5 3
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Sulphur springs vs Frankfort

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Sulphur springs at 14% compared to 4% in Frankfort.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Frankfort at 93% compared to 63% in Sulphur springs.
  • The Asian population is larger in Sulphur springs at 1% compared to 0% in Frankfort.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Sulphur springs at 17% compared to 0% in Frankfort.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Sulphur springs at 5% compared to 3% in Frankfort.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Sulphur springs and Frankfort at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Sulphur springs Frankfort
Mental Health Not Good 19.1% 16.5%
Physical Health Not Good 13.2% 10.4%
Depression 24.8% 25.6%
Smoking 20.1% 16.8%
Binge Drinking 17.5% 18.6%
Obesity 39.5% 33.7%
Disability Percentage 15.0% 16.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Sulphur springs vs Frankfort

  • More residents in Sulphur springs report poor mental health at 19.1% compared to 16.5% in Frankfort.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Frankfort at 25.6% versus 24.8% in Sulphur springs.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Sulphur springs at 20.1% compared to 16.8% in Frankfort.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Frankfort at 18.6% compared to 17.5% in Sulphur springs.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Sulphur springs at 39.5% compared to 33.7% in Frankfort.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Frankfort at 16.0% compared to 15.0% in Sulphur springs.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Sulphur springs Frankfort
No Schooling 0.8% (127) 2.8% (35)
High School Diploma 18.3% (3,003) 19.2% (244)
Less than High School 16.0% (2,628) 19.0% (242)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 13.7% (2,248) 27.1% (345)

Education Levels Comparison: Sulphur springs vs Frankfort

  • In Frankfort, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.8% compared to 0.8% in Sulphur springs.
  • In Frankfort, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 19.2% compared to 18.3% in Sulphur springs.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Frankfort at 19.0%, compared to 16.0% in Sulphur springs.
  • In Frankfort, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 27.1% compared to 13.7% in Sulphur springs.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.