Demographics details for Sulphur springs, TX vs Eufaula, AL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Sulphur springs, TX vs Eufaula, AL.
| Data | Sulphur springs | Eufaula |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 16,408 | 12,539 |
| Median Age | 39.4 years | 37.0 years |
| Median Income | $54,950 | $39,511 |
| Married Families | 39.0% | 32.0% |
| Poverty Level | 15% | 13% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Sulphur springs vs Eufaula
- In Sulphur springs, the population is higher at 16,408, compared to 12,539 in Eufaula.
- Residents in Sulphur springs have a higher median age of 39.4 years compared to 37.0 years in Eufaula.
- Sulphur springs has a higher median income of $54,950 compared to $39,511 in Eufaula.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Sulphur springs at 39.0% compared to 32.0% in Eufaula.
- Sulphur springs has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 13% in Eufaula.
- The unemployment rate in Sulphur springs is higher at 4.5%, compared to 3.5% in Eufaula.
Demographics
Demographics Sulphur springs vs Eufaula provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Sulphur springs | Eufaula |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 14 | 45 |
| White | 63 | 48 |
| Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 17 | 4 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 3 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Sulphur springs vs Eufaula
- In Eufaula, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 45% compared to 14% in Sulphur springs.
- Sulphur springs has a higher percentage of White residents at 63% compared to 48% in Eufaula.
- The Asian population is larger in Sulphur springs at 1% compared to 0% in Eufaula.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Sulphur springs at 17% compared to 4% in Eufaula.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Sulphur springs at 5% compared to 3% in Eufaula.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Sulphur springs and Eufaula at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Sulphur springs | Eufaula |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.1% | 21.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.2% | 16.1% |
| Depression | 24.8% | 24.6% |
| Smoking | 20.1% | 24.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.5% | 12.6% |
| Obesity | 39.5% | 43.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 15.0% | 19.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Sulphur springs vs Eufaula
- In Eufaula, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 21.5% compared to 19.1% in Sulphur springs.
- Depression is more prevalent in Sulphur springs at 24.8% compared to 24.6% in Eufaula.
- Eufaula has a higher smoking rate at 24.8% compared to 20.1% in Sulphur springs.
- Binge drinking is more common in Sulphur springs at 17.5% compared to 12.6% in Eufaula.
- Eufaula has higher obesity rates at 43.0% compared to 39.5% in Sulphur springs.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Eufaula at 19.0% compared to 15.0% in Sulphur springs.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Sulphur springs | Eufaula |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.8% (127) | 1.0% (120) |
| High School Diploma | 18.3% (3,003) | 19.0% (2,377) |
| Less than High School | 16.0% (2,628) | 18.0% (2,256) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 13.7% (2,248) | 11.4% (1,430) |
Education Levels Comparison: Sulphur springs vs Eufaula
- In Eufaula, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.0% compared to 0.8% in Sulphur springs.
- In Eufaula, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 19.0% compared to 18.3% in Sulphur springs.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Eufaula at 18.0%, compared to 16.0% in Sulphur springs.
- A higher percentage of residents in Sulphur springs hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 13.7% compared to 11.4% in Eufaula.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.