Demographics details for Sulphur springs, TX vs Edmonds, WA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Sulphur springs, TX vs Edmonds, WA.

Data Sulphur springs Edmonds
Population 16,408 42,593
Median Age 39.4 years 45.8 years
Median Income $54,950 $110,057
Married Families 39.0% 49.0%
Poverty Level 15% Data is updating
Unemployment Rate 4.5 4.7

Population Comparison: Sulphur springs vs Edmonds

  • The population in Edmonds is higher at 42,593, compared to 16,408 in Sulphur springs.
  • The median age in Edmonds is higher at 45.8 years, compared to 39.4 years in Sulphur springs.
  • Edmonds has a higher median income of $110,057, compared to $54,950 in Sulphur springs.
  • In Edmonds, the percentage of married families is higher at 49.0%, compared to 39.0% in Sulphur springs.
  • Sulphur springs has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 0% in Edmonds.
  • Edmonds has a higher unemployment rate at 4.7% compared to 4.5% in Sulphur springs.

Demographics

Demographics Sulphur springs vs Edmonds provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Sulphur springs Edmonds
Black 14 2
White 63 75
Asian 1 9
Hispanic 17 6
Two or More Races 5 8
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Sulphur springs vs Edmonds

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Sulphur springs at 14% compared to 2% in Edmonds.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Edmonds at 75% compared to 63% in Sulphur springs.
  • In Edmonds, the Asian population stands at 9%, greater than 1% in Sulphur springs.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Sulphur springs at 17% compared to 6% in Edmonds.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Edmonds at 8%, compared to 5% in Sulphur springs.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Sulphur springs and Edmonds at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Sulphur springs Edmonds
Mental Health Not Good 19.1% 15.3%
Physical Health Not Good 13.2% 9.2%
Depression 24.8% 28.1%
Smoking 20.1% 9.6%
Binge Drinking 17.5% 16.4%
Obesity 39.5% 31.0%
Disability Percentage 15.0% 12.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Sulphur springs vs Edmonds

  • More residents in Sulphur springs report poor mental health at 19.1% compared to 15.3% in Edmonds.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Edmonds at 28.1% versus 24.8% in Sulphur springs.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Sulphur springs at 20.1% compared to 9.6% in Edmonds.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Sulphur springs at 17.5% compared to 16.4% in Edmonds.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Sulphur springs at 39.5% compared to 31.0% in Edmonds.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Sulphur springs at 15.0% compared to 12.0% in Edmonds.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Sulphur springs Edmonds
No Schooling 0.8% (127) 0.5% (232)
High School Diploma 18.3% (3,003) 11.0% (4,689)
Less than High School 16.0% (2,628) 4.1% (1,747)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 13.7% (2,248) 38.7% (16,493)

Education Levels Comparison: Sulphur springs vs Edmonds

  • A higher percentage of residents in Sulphur springs have no formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.5% in Edmonds.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Sulphur springs hold a high school diploma at 18.3% compared to 11.0% in Edmonds.
  • More residents in Sulphur springs have less than a high school education at 16.0% compared to 4.1% in Edmonds.
  • In Edmonds, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 38.7% compared to 13.7% in Sulphur springs.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.