Demographics details for Sulphur springs, TX vs Edgefield, SC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Sulphur springs, TX vs Edgefield, SC.
| Data | Sulphur springs | Edgefield |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 16,408 | 26,932 |
| Median Age | 39.4 years | 42.9 years |
| Median Income | $54,950 | $60,033 |
| Married Families | 39.0% | 38.0% |
| Poverty Level | 15% | 13% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 4.9 |
Population Comparison: Sulphur springs vs Edgefield
- The population in Edgefield is higher at 26,932, compared to 16,408 in Sulphur springs.
- The median age in Edgefield is higher at 42.9 years, compared to 39.4 years in Sulphur springs.
- Edgefield has a higher median income of $60,033, compared to $54,950 in Sulphur springs.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Sulphur springs at 39.0% compared to 38.0% in Edgefield.
- Sulphur springs has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 13% in Edgefield.
- Edgefield has a higher unemployment rate at 4.9% compared to 4.5% in Sulphur springs.
Demographics
Demographics Sulphur springs vs Edgefield provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Sulphur springs | Edgefield |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 14 | 32 |
| White | 63 | 56 |
| Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 17 | 7 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 5 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Sulphur springs vs Edgefield
- In Edgefield, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 32% compared to 14% in Sulphur springs.
- Sulphur springs has a higher percentage of White residents at 63% compared to 56% in Edgefield.
- The Asian population is larger in Sulphur springs at 1% compared to 0% in Edgefield.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Sulphur springs at 17% compared to 7% in Edgefield.
- Both Sulphur springs and Edgefield have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 5%.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Sulphur springs and Edgefield at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Sulphur springs | Edgefield |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.1% | 18.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.2% | 13.1% |
| Depression | 24.8% | 20.3% |
| Smoking | 20.1% | 20.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.5% | 16.5% |
| Obesity | 39.5% | 36.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 15.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Sulphur springs vs Edgefield
- More residents in Sulphur springs report poor mental health at 19.1% compared to 18.1% in Edgefield.
- Depression is more prevalent in Sulphur springs at 24.8% compared to 20.3% in Edgefield.
- Edgefield has a higher smoking rate at 20.3% compared to 20.1% in Sulphur springs.
- Binge drinking is more common in Sulphur springs at 17.5% compared to 16.5% in Edgefield.
- Obesity rates are higher in Sulphur springs at 39.5% compared to 36.7% in Edgefield.
- Disability percentages are higher in Sulphur springs at 15.0% compared to 14.0% in Edgefield.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Sulphur springs | Edgefield |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.8% (127) | 0.7% (199) |
| High School Diploma | 18.3% (3,003) | 19.2% (5,180) |
| Less than High School | 16.0% (2,628) | 18.3% (4,938) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 13.7% (2,248) | 14.1% (3,798) |
Education Levels Comparison: Sulphur springs vs Edgefield
- A higher percentage of residents in Sulphur springs have no formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.7% in Edgefield.
- In Edgefield, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 19.2% compared to 18.3% in Sulphur springs.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Edgefield at 18.3%, compared to 16.0% in Sulphur springs.
- In Edgefield, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 14.1% compared to 13.7% in Sulphur springs.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.